Ampere's Law: Find |H| at (6cm, 9cm, 0) in Toroid

Natalie89
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

A toroid of a circular cross section whose center is at the origin and the axis the same as the z-axis has 1000 turns with po=10cm, a=1cm. If the toroid carries a 100mA current, find |H| at (6cm, 9cm, 0).



2. Homework Equations

How do I calculate |H| at certain points?



3. The Attempt at a Solution

Knowing that H = NI / 2*pi*po, and po - a < p < po + a, I have found p to be between 9cm and 11 cm.

I assumed H = H1 + H2.

If H1 = ((1000)(0.1) / 2 * pi * 0.9) * (0.06x + 0.09y) = 10.61x + 15.92y
Similarly, H2 is the same except p = 0.11 m. Therefore H2=8.68x + 13.02y.

After adding the two, and then finding the magnitude I get 34.8 A/m, but the answer is 147.1 A/m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what H1 and H2 are and you don't explain. Look, you have a formula that gives H as a function of the radius. Everywhere at that radius the field is the same. So, at what radius is point (6 cm, 9 cm, 0)?
 
H1 and H2 are H, except one is calculated at 9cm and one is calculated at 11cm. H, I'm assuming, is the sum.
 
No it is not the sum. At a given radius r

H=\mu_{0}\frac{N I}{2\pi r}

The above expression says "You give me the radius, I will give you H."

So, at what radius is point (6 cm, 9 cm, 0)?
 
Last edited:
Ok thank you! That helps a lot. Even if I do find 'r', what do I do with the a and p values?
 
What do the a and p values represent?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top