Analytical three-dimensional Fourier transform

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the challenge of performing a three-dimensional Fourier transform as outlined in problem 5.9 of the Byron & Fuller mathematical methods for classical and quantum physics. The user attempted to utilize spherical coordinates but encountered difficulties in simplifying the problem. They also considered applying Gauss's or Green's theorem but did not achieve success. The community is invited to provide guidance on effectively solving this Fourier transform problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of three-dimensional Fourier transforms
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates
  • Knowledge of Gauss's theorem and Green's theorem
  • Basic principles of classical and quantum physics as per Byron & Fuller
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of three-dimensional Fourier transforms in physics
  • Study the conversion of Cartesian coordinates to spherical coordinates
  • Explore the use of Gauss's theorem in solving integrals
  • Review Green's theorem and its implications in vector calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those studying mathematical methods for classical and quantum physics, as well as anyone looking to deepen their understanding of Fourier transforms.

johnkay
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am trying to do some self-studying in Byron & Fuller mathematical methods for classical and quantum physics. I have slightly ran aground on this one task of finding 3d Fourier transforms and I can't find the info in the book itself to free me. Google has neither been very fruitfull.

Homework Statement



It is problem 5.9 in the book and can be seen here (obviously I only need to really 'solve' a.)

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2507151/screenshot.png"

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried going into spherical coordinates and ended up with a big mess and I was not quite sure what to do there anyway.

Then I wondered if I perhaps could make the problem into some almost one-liner through Gauss or Green's theorem or the like. But I have not been quite successful there either.

any pointers on how this should be done?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first approach sounds right. Show us what you did.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K