Analyzing Inelastic Collision Data from a graph

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing a force versus displacement graph related to a head-on inelastic collision between two masses. Participants express confusion over how to interpret the graph and apply relevant physics equations, particularly regarding impulse, momentum, and energy. There is uncertainty about the values derived from the graph, such as the velocities and forces acting on each mass. Clarification is sought on distinguishing between the forces on the two objects and understanding the implications of the graph for the collision dynamics. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clear understanding of the relationships between force, displacement, and time in the context of the problem.
elements
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A head on collision between mass and mass B occurs as described in the F vs s graph below.

Complete the table in the data section

Find \vec{x}A
Find \vec{x}B

see attached page for clarification

Homework Equations


P=m*v
\DeltaP=F*t
Ek=\stackrel{1}{2}mv2
\vec{d} = \vec{v}t
W=F*\vec{d}

The Attempt at a Solution



I've attempted to use the impulse and the momentum formula to apply to the graph but the numbers just isn't matching up I am unsure of how the 0 and 75 was arrived at just by observing the graph nor can I figure out how velocity 1 was 24 vs v2 at 0.

This is algebraic physics not calculus.
 

Attachments

  • 20140413_212857.jpg
    20140413_212857.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 511
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
elements said:

Homework Statement



A head on collision between mass and mass B occurs as described in the F vs s graph below.

Complete the table in the data section

Find \vec{x}A
Find \vec{x}B

see attached page for clarification

Homework Equations


P=mv
\DeltaP=Ft



The Attempt at a Solution



I've attempted to use the impulse and the momentum formula to apply to the graph but the numbers just isn't matching up I am unsure of how the 0 and 75 was arrived at just by observing the graph nor can I figure out how velocity 1 was 24 vs v2 at 0.

This is algebraic physics not calculus.
I don't quite understand your graph. There are two forces: the force on A and the force on B. There is one line joining several data points (F, s). Which parts of the graph relate to the force on A and which relate to the force on B?

AM
 
The impulse is the area under the F vs t graph.
You graph is F vs s (is s displacement?) ... what equations have force and displacement together?

Physics without calculus??!
Oh and I see the "lab" did not involve any actual practical work.

It looks a bit like sudoku: you can't just fill it in left to right. The force-displacement graph can be used to tell you the work, and so the change in energy. You need the relations between work, energy, and force, and displacement to understand it.

The graph looks like the force-displacement for one object from the point of contact.
It approaches the target under acceleration of 8N force pointing the other way, comes to rest, then bounces off.
The force during the recoil is less than during the approach.
Is this correct?

These look to be pretty big objects though.
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
The impulse is the area under the F vs t graph.
You graph is F vs s (is s displacement?) ... what equations have force and displacement together?

Physics without calculus??!
Oh and I see the "lab" did not involve any actual practical work.

It looks a bit like sudoku: you can't just fill it in left to right. The force-displacement graph can be used to tell you the work, and so the change in energy. You need the relations between work, energy, and force, and displacement to understand it.

The graph looks like the force-displacement for one object from the point of contact.
It approaches the target under acceleration of 8N force pointing the other way, comes to rest, then bounces off.
The force during the recoil is less than during the approach.
Is this correct?

These look to be pretty big objects though.

Well this is a collision type problem, which means conservation of momentum occurs, so I'd assume you are correct but I'm not so sure, myself. I mean I have the impulse and Kinetic energy recorded per area of contact with the force turning points. But I am not sure how to factor in the time thing or what xa means, I'm assuming it's displacement of object A and object B but I have no clue how to find that out from the graph or the data given. especially with time involved, I don't know where 1s is or where 0s was.

Andrew Mason said:
I don't quite understand your graph. There are two forces: the force on A and the force on B. There is one line joining several data points (F, s). Which parts of the graph relate to the force on A and which relate to the force on B?

AM

I do not know which relates to which, what I do know is that this is a inelastic collision so I am assuming that that is the total force/displacement of the two objects together.
 
Last edited:
elements said:
I do not know which relates to which, what I do know is that this is a inelastic collision so I am assuming that that is the total force/displacement of the two objects together.
? The motion of the centre of mass of the two objects cannot change if the only forces are due to the collision. So if the graph is supposed to represent the force on the two bodies stuck together after the collision, the force should be 0.

Can you give us the whole problem as it was presented to you, before you wrote anything on the graph? Can you then give us all the data that you have and tell us where it comes from?

AM
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top