Angular and linear velocity propeller

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum radius of an airplane propeller designed to operate at 2400 rpm while ensuring the tip speed does not exceed 270 m/s. The forward airspeed of the plane is 75 m/s, and the relationship between the tip speed, plane speed, and tangential velocity is expressed through the equation vtip² = vplane² + vtan². There is confusion regarding the derivation of this equation, particularly how the vector sum of the plane's forward velocity and the propeller's tangential velocity results in the tip velocity. It is noted that the tip trajectory follows a spiral path, and the forward speed contributes to the overall speed calculation. Understanding these relationships is crucial for determining the maximum allowable radius of the propeller.
henry3369
Messages
194
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are designing an airplane propeller that is to turn at 2400 rpm (Fig. 9.13a). The forward airspeed of the plane is to be 75m/s, and the speed of the tips of the propeller blades through the air must not exceed 270m/s. (This is about 80% of the speed of sound in air. If the speed of the propeller tips were greater than this, they would produce a lot of noise.) What is the maximum possible propeller radius?

Homework Equations


vtip2 = vplane2 + vtan2

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to solve this equation to find the maximum radius, but I'm having trouble understanding the derivation of the equation. I know that vplane points in the direction of the plane's motion; thus, the propeller also has this same velocity in the same direction. Then angular velocity can be related to tangential velocity by v = rw. How does the vector sum of these two result in the velocity of the tip of the propeller and isn't the direction of vtip also be tangential to the direction of motion of the propeller so vtip = vtan?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tip trajectory is a spiral in the air. The 75 m/s does contribute (a little) in the square root of the squared sum.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top