Angular frequency of orbiting charge in electric and magnetic fields

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the change in angular frequency (dω) of a charged particle in a circular orbit when a magnetic field is applied. The original angular frequency is given by the equation ω₀² = (qQ)/(4πε₀mR³). Participants express frustration over deriving the correct expression for dω, which is known to be dω = (qB)/(2m). The solution involves applying the Lorentz force and recognizing that neglecting higher-order terms is crucial for simplification. Ultimately, the problem is resolved by correctly expanding the left-hand side of the equation and disregarding the dω² term.
JamesOza
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m and charge -q moves in a circular orbit of radius R about a fixed charge Q. The angular frequency for the orbit is given by \omega_0^2 = \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 m R^3} A uniform magnetic field of magnitude B in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the orbit is turned on. As a result, the angular frequency is changed to \omega_0 + d\omega. Assuming that B is sufficiently small so that products of B and d\omega can be neglected, calculate d\omega.

The Attempt at a Solution



This problem has frustrated me for days, particularly as I know the answer to be d\omega = \frac{qB}{2m} I have tried using the Lorentz force with motion in a circle to try and obtain the answer, but end up nowhere. There must be some mathematical trickery, possibly with approximations, that I’m missing. Any help and hints with how to start and proceed with this problem will be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This seems to be a rather straight-forward application of the Lorentz force. Show what you have done.
 
I agree it should be a straight forward application of the Lorentz force. I can see that the given answer for d\omega is half the angular frequency if there was no electric field. Here’s how I started, m \omega^2 R = q(E + \omega RB) \omega^2 = \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 m R^3} + \frac{q \omega B}{m} However substituting \omega = \omega_0 + d\omega and noticing that the 1st term on the RHS is \omega_0^2 doesn’t lead me to the solution. What am I missing? Thanks.
 
Expand the LHS. What's left of the equation when you apply your observation about the RHS?
 
Solved it! I’d expanded the LHS several times, and every time I did I neglected to ignore dw^2. Thanks for your help voko, it was reassuring to know I was on the right track.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top