Angular velocity, acceleration, and torque

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the directional properties of angular velocity, acceleration, torque, and momentum, questioning why they point perpendicular to the rotation rather than tangentially. Participants clarify that the context involves circular motion, specifically comparing a merry-go-round to a coin spinning on its edge. The use of a perpendicular vector simplifies calculations, as it incorporates both direction and magnitude effectively. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the geometry of rotation to grasp these concepts. Ultimately, the perpendicular nature of these vectors is essential for accurate mathematical representation in rotational dynamics.
BadSkittles
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hello, can anyone explain why the direction of angular velocity, acceleration, torque, and momentum point perpendicular to the rotation of the circle? It seems to make more sense if it pointed in the tangential direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BadSkittles said:
Hello, can anyone explain why the direction of angular velocity, acceleration, torque, and momentum point perpendicular to the rotation of the circle? It seems to make more sense if it pointed in the tangential direction.

What actual circle is rotating here, and is it rotating like a merry-go-round or like a coin spinning on its edge?
 
BadSkittles said:
Hello, can anyone explain why the direction of angular velocity, acceleration, torque, and momentum point perpendicular to the rotation of the circle? It seems to make more sense if it pointed in the tangential direction.
By using a vector perpendicular to the plane of some angular quality, the math is simpler since normal vector math can be used, and a vector provides sufficient information, direction and magnitude.
 
Last edited:
a merry go around like circle
 
What tangent? It's a merry go round. There is no one tangent.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top