Angular Velocity of a wheel problem

AI Thread Summary
A wheel initially rotating at 12.5 rad/s experienced a torque for 15.7 seconds, increasing its angular velocity to 54.0 rad/s. The initial solution calculated the angle turned as 5310.9 rad, which was deemed incorrect. After clarification, the correct approach involved calculating the angular acceleration as 2.66 rad/s², leading to a more reasonable angle of 524 rad. Further discussion highlighted that using SUVAT equations could simplify the problem by omitting the need to find acceleration. The final consensus emphasized the importance of applying the right equations for angular motion.
Kallum
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
The question:

A wheel was rotating at 12.5 rad/s when a torque was applied for 15.7 s. The angular velocity increased to 54.0 rad/s. What angle did the wheel turn through in that time?

My Solution:

theta = Wo*t+1/2*a*t^2
= (12.5 rad/s)(15.7)+(1/2)(41.5)(15.7)^2

therefore,

theta = 5310.9 rad.

Comment:

This answer doesn't seem right to me and I am stuck on what to do.

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check the physical dimensions of the numbers you have entered!
 
Welcome to PF.
It looks like you found α = 41.5. That would have been true if the specified velocity change occurred within 1 second. But it took 15.7 seconds.
 
Thank you for your responses, so I should do α = 41.5/15.7 to break it down to seconds and then use α = 2.66 rad/s as my value for acceleration?

That then gives me an answer of 524 rad. This seems more reasonable!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes TomHart
Kallum said:
Thank you for your responses, so I should do α = 41.5/15.7 to break it down to seconds and then use α = 2.66 rad/s as my value for acceleration?

That then gives me an answer of 524 rad. This seems more reasonable!
Near enough - I get 522.
But angular movements at constant acceleration are analogous to linear ones. All the usual SUVAT equations carry over. If you remember those, for each of the five variables (initial speed, final speed, acceleration, distance, time) there is an equation that omits one and connects the other four. In this case you have initial speed, final speed and time, and you want to find distance. So there is no need to find acceleration if you pick the right equation.
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top