Angular Velocity: Reference Dot Speed at 2000 RPM for 8 cm Disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a reference dot on an 8 cm diameter disk after it accelerates to 2000 RPM. The angular velocity is converted from RPM to radians per second, resulting in 100π/3 radians per second. Using the formula v = ωr, where the radius is 4 cm, the speed of the reference dot is determined to be 400π/3 cm/s at t=1. The calculations demonstrate the conversion process and application of angular velocity in determining linear speed. This provides a clear understanding of the relationship between angular motion and linear speed.
marissa12
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
a disk is 8.0 cm in diameter. A reference dot on the edge of the disk is initially located at theta =45 . The disk accelerates steadily for 1/2 second, reaching 2000 rpm, then coasts at steady angular velocity for another 1/2 second. What is the speed of the reference dot at t=1

ok so you need to use v=omega*radius

and omega=2000rpm? I am not sure if someone could help me out with that i should be able to solve it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you're right, omega = 2000 rpm. Just convert that into SI.
 


Sure, I can help you out with that! So, first let's convert the angular velocity of 2000 rpm to radians per second. We know that 1 revolution is equal to 2π radians, so we can use that conversion factor to convert from rpm to radians per second.

2000 rpm = 2000 revolutions per minute
= (2000 * 2π) radians per minute
= (2000 * 2π) / 60 radians per second
= 2000π/60 radians per second
= 100π/3 radians per second

Now, we can use the formula v = ωr to find the speed of the reference dot at t=1. We know that the radius of the disk is 4 cm (since the diameter is 8 cm), and we just calculated the angular velocity to be 100π/3 radians per second.

So, plugging in these values into the formula, we get:

v = (100π/3) * 4
= 400π/3 cm/s

Therefore, the speed of the reference dot at t=1 is 400π/3 cm/s.

Hope that helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top