What is the Effect of Reduced Air Resistance on an Object's Acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dberry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
Reducing air resistance on an object moving at constant velocity affects its acceleration by altering the net force. Initially, the net force is zero, indicating no acceleration; however, when air resistance decreases by a factor of four, the net force becomes 3/4 F. This change leads to a corresponding acceleration, calculated using F=ma. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the forces acting on the object, specifically the balance between the propelling force and air resistance. Ultimately, the net force's increase due to reduced air resistance results in a measurable acceleration.
Dberry
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If F is the force of air resistance on an object with mass m moving at a constant velocity, which of the following best describes the acceleration of the object when the force of air resistance is reduced by a factor of 4?


Homework Equations


F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


The options listed are:
a) F/m
b) 1/2 F/m
c) 1/4 F/m
d) 3/4 F/m

My original thinking was that if there is constant velocity then there is no acceleration. But since that wasn't a choice I went with option c). However, the back of my book lists option d) as the answer, saying that the force propelling the projectile also has a force, so when the air resistance is reduced by a factor of 4 the net force must be F - 1/4 F = 3/4 F. I guess what I don't understand is why I have to subtract from the force projecting the projectile.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To find the acceleration, you need the net force on the object. What two forces act on the object? When the object has constant velocity, what must the net force be? But when the air resistance force changes, so does the net force.
 
Doc Al said:
To find the acceleration, you need the net force on the object. What two forces act on the object?
The forces acting on the object are air resistance and the force propelling it.

Doc Al said:
When the object has constant velocity, what must the net force be?
The net force must be zero because constant velocity means there is no acceleration, so according to F=ma F is zero.

The net force acting on the object right now are the two forces mentioned above and nothing else right? Or are the mass and velocity a part of the net force?
 
Dberry said:
The forces acting on the object are air resistance and the force propelling it.
Right. And presumably the force propelling it does not change.

The net force must be zero because constant velocity means there is no acceleration, so according to F=ma F is zero.
Exactly. So that tells you how big the propelling force is. (In terms of F, at least.)

The net force acting on the object right now are the two forces mentioned above and nothing else right?
Right. The vector sum of those two forces.
Or are the mass and velocity a part of the net force?
No.
 
To illustrate the problem I've created the following figures:

Before:
[URL]http://img63.imageshack.us/i/qbefore.png/[/URL]
In case image doesn't show (link): http://img63.imageshack.us/i/qbefore.png/

After:
[URL]http://img252.imageshack.us/i/qafter.png/[/URL]
In case image doesn't show (link): http://img252.imageshack.us/i/qafter.png/

As you see, the net force F_{net} increases as air resistance decreases.

Something wrong with the latex subscript..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top