Answer Kinetic Energy Questions About an Asteroid Moving in Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter sponsoredwalk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An asteroid moving in empty space will have its kinetic energy increased when a force is applied by a robotic arm, resulting in a higher velocity upon release. Once the force ceases, no additional work is done on the asteroid, so its kinetic energy remains constant as it continues to move. The asteroid retains its kinetic energy as long as it maintains its velocity, regardless of external forces acting on it afterward. Kinetic energy is associated with motion, meaning any object in motion possesses kinetic energy, independent of whether a force is currently acting on it. The discussion clarifies that confusion about kinetic energy often arises from misunderstandings of how forces and motion interact.
sponsoredwalk
Messages
531
Reaction score
5
Hi I just have a quick question about Kinetic Energy.

If we imagine an asteroid in empty space with no gravity field acting on it, i.e. it's just in empty space moving along according to Newtons 1st Law i.e. with constant velocity.

Imagine a ship extends a magical robotic hand and exerts a force on the asteroid for a few seconds before letting it go, I want to know what happens.

I would say that because K_2 - K_1 = ½mv² - ½mv_0² = Fd the asteroid will have a higher kinetic energy at the end when the robotic arm let's go.

1: But, say an hour later, the asteroid will still be moving forward, will it still have the same kinetic energy as it did when it was released from the robotic arm?
No force is acting on it so no work is done but does the asteroid still have kinetic energy?

2: Also, if I use the kinetic energy as the asteroid is moving, well after it has been released, I will get the answer that the ship has no kinetic energy, what is wrong here?
Does something have kinetic energy only while a force acts on it?

I know it will have momentum as it moves but what about kinetic energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sponsoredwalk said:
1: But, say an hour later, the asteroid will still be moving forward, will it still have the same kinetic energy as it did when it was released from the robotic arm?

Yes. Energy is conserved. It doesn't just disappear.

sponsoredwalk said:
No force is acting on it so no work is done but does the asteroid still have kinetic energy?

The work done is equal to the CHANGE in kinetic energy. If no work is done, the kinetic energy will remain the same. It won't change. That's why it will be exactly the same one hour later.

sponsoredwalk said:
2: Also, if I use the kinetic energy as the asteroid is moving, well after it has been released, I will get the answer that the ship has no kinetic energy, what is wrong here?

I don't understand what you mean. Can you explain more clearly what exactly you are trying to compute?

sponsoredwalk said:
Does something have kinetic energy only while a force acts on it?

No, a force is not required! As the formula for kinetic energy that you posted clearly shows, if something has velocity, it has kinetic energy. Kinetic means "having to do with motion", and kinetic energy is the energy associated with motion. If something is moving, it has kinetic energy.
 
does the force exerted by the robotic arm lead to a change in velocity? so won't there b a change in KE
 
Hi thanks for the informative answer.

Well yeah, while the robotic arm exerts a force on the asteroid it will accelerate the asteroid forward for say 5 seconds, initially the asteroid has velocity v_1 and then after the robotic arm let's go 5 seconds later the asteroid moves forwards faster with velocity v_2.

My second part was unclear, sorry about that. I've got it now I was just confused for one second after reading a quack paper on kinetic energy.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top