Applying Selection Rules to Determine Non-Zero Ground State Perturbations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Diracobama2181
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perturbation
Diracobama2181
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Consider a rigid rotator (i.e. a bar shaped system of fixed separation) of moment of inertia I about an axis through its center perpendicular to the direction of the bar, with Hamiltonian $$H_0 = \frac{L_2}{2I}$$ and electric dipole moment d. Suppose that while it is in its ground state

it is subjected to a perturbation $$V (t) = −d · E(t)$$ due to a time-dependent external electric field

$$E(t) = zˆE0e^{t/τ}$$ which points in the z-direction and which is switched on at time t = 0.

Here E0 is a time-independent constant. Determine to which of its

excited states the rotator can make transitions in lowest order in V (t) ,

and calculate the transition probabilities for finding the rotator in each

of these states at time t → ∞.
Relevant Equations
$$d_f=\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{0}^{T'} e^{iw_{fi}t}v_{ni} dx$$
Since E_i=0 for the ground state, and $$E_f=\frac{(\hbar)^2l(l+1)}{2I}$$, $$w_{fi}=\frac{E_f-E_i}{\hbar}=\frac{(\hbar)l(l+1)}{2I}$$.
So, $$d_f(\infty)=\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}<f|E_od_z|0>e^{\frac{i\hbar l(l+1)t}{2I}+\frac{t}{\tau}}dt$$

My question is in regards to $$<f|E_0d_z|0>$$. Does d_z have parity? Also, how can I apply the selection rules to determine which eigenstates (ie, spherical harmonics) will not give $$<f|E_0d_z|0>=0$$? Also, is my integral set up correctly, because it seems like it would diverge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The trick is to convert ##\hat{z}## into a spherical harmonic, such that ##\langle f | \hat{z} | i \rangle## becomes the integral of a product of 3 spherical harmonics, for which there are closed formulas.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalHarmonic.html
 
Diracobama2181 said:
So, $$d_f(\infty)=\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}<f|E_od_z|0>e^{\frac{i\hbar l(l+1)t}{2I}+\frac{t}{\tau}}dt$$
Careful with the limits of integration here.
 
But wouldn't the dot product in V(t) get rid of the $$\hat Z$$?
 
Ok, made some changes. I first noted that $$\overrightarrow{d}=q\overrightarrow{d}$$.
So $$V(t)=E_0e^{\frac{t}{\tau}}qz$$. From here, I note $$z=dcos\theta$$, and hence $$Z=r2(\frac{\pi}{3})^(\frac{1}{2})Y_{l=1,m=0}$$. Therefore, $$ <l',m'|r2(\frac{\pi}{3})^(\frac{1}{2})Y_{l=1,m=0}|l=0.\,m=0>=0$$ unless l'=1 and m'=0. Seem right? The $$<l'=1,m'=0|r2(\frac{\pi}{3})^(\frac{1}{2})Y_{l=1,m=0}|l=0,m=0>=r2(\frac{\pi}{3})^(\frac{1}{2})$$ From there, I would integrate $$d(t)=\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{0}^{t}qE_0r2(\frac{\pi}{2})^{\frac{1}{3}}e^{\frac{i\hbar t}{I}}e^{-\frac{t}{T}}dt$$
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top