Arc Length of Curve r(t) from 0 to 1: Find the Integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter SummerPhysStudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AI Thread Summary
To find the arc length of the curve r(t) = <2t, e^t, e^(-t)> from t = 0 to t = 1, the integral L is expressed as the integral from 0 to 1 of the magnitude of r'(t) dt. The derived expression for the integral is S01 sqrt(4 + e^(2t) + e^(-2t)) dt, which can be simplified to ∫_{0}^{1} sqrt{4 + 2cosh(2t)} dt. This integral does not yield a simple solution and is evaluated using Mathematica, resulting in an expression involving the complete elliptic integral of the second kind. The discussion highlights the complexity of elliptic integrals, indicating that they can be challenging to solve.
SummerPhysStudent
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok, So i need to find the arc length of the curve r(t) = < 2t, e^t, e^(-t)> from 0<=t<=1
so L should be the integral from 0 to 1 over the magnitude of r'(t) dt. So what I'm getting is
S01 sqrt(4 + e2t + e-2t)dt
and this I'm not sure how to do this integral. Anyhelp?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use Latex to type up the integral instead of using that weird S. You might want to check what |r'(t)| dt is again. The integral you'll get won't be pretty though.
 
For whatever its worth, I chucked the integral into Mathematica and it didn't solve it.

Oh, wait, well if we screw around with the integral to get

\int_{0}^{1}\sqrt{4+2(\frac{e^2t + e^-2t}{2})}dt=\int_{0}^{1}\sqrt{4+2cosh(2t)}dt

and then chuck it into Mathematica, it says:

i\sqrt{6}EllipticE[i,\frac{2}{3}]

The EllipticE[ , ] is a complete elliptic integral of the second kind.

In the words of Gandalf in the mines of moria (movie) "This foe is beyond any of you. Run!" (beyond me anyway, elliptic integrals, yick! )

kevin
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top