Are Bessel Functions Differentiable at Boundary Conditions?

dikmikkel
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to make sure that a solution to a differrential equation given by bessel functions of the first kind and second kind meet at a border(r=a), and it to be differenitable. So i shall determine the constants c_1 and c_2

I use notation from Schaums outlines

Homework Equations


The functions:
R_1 = c_1J_\gamma(\kappa r),\hspace{8pt}r\in [0,a]\\<br /> R_2 = c_2K_\gamma(\sigma r),\hspace{8pt}r\in[a,b]

The Attempt at a Solution


For the solution to be continuous at r=a:
c_1J_\gamma(\kappa a) = c_2K_\gamma(\sigma a)
For it to be differentiable:
c_1J&#039;_\gamma(\kappa a) = c_2K&#039;_\gamma(\sigma a)
I tried taking the determinant of the matrix describing the system at set it equal to zero, but i didn't seem to work. I also know from another part of the problem, that \gamma\in\mathbb{Z}
But is there a trick I've missed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the extreme case of σ = \kappa, what you try to do is impossible. You can't expect a Bessel function to smoothly connect to a Neumann function, in the general case, you can only expect a Bessel function to connect smoothly with a linear combination of Bessel and Neumann functions. (Incident+Reflected=Transmitted)
 
Yeah my teacher said so too. He mentioned that of course the contuinity should be at the tangential field, not the radial. But thanks for the help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top