What is the derivation of the second equation for area velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shreya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Velocity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the second equation for area velocity, specifically in the context of motion in the (x,y,0) plane. The initial equation is established through geometric reasoning involving the area swept out by a particle, using the cross-product of position and velocity vectors. The second equation is derived using Cartesian and polar coordinates, with the relationship between the position vector \vec r and the velocity vector \vec v clearly defined. The final expression for area velocity is confirmed as \frac {dS} {dt} = \frac 1 2 (xv_y - yv_x).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically cross-products
  • Familiarity with Cartesian and polar coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of basic physics concepts related to motion and area velocity
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation and derivation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of area velocity in polar coordinates
  • Explore vector calculus applications in physics, focusing on cross-products
  • Learn about the implications of area velocity in orbital mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between angular momentum and area velocity
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mathematicians, and engineers interested in kinematics and dynamics, particularly those focusing on motion in two-dimensional planes.

Shreya
Messages
187
Reaction score
64
Homework Statement
I want to understand the second equation for Areal velocity as given below.
Relevant Equations
Refer below.
Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-29-43.png
Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-30-05.png

I think I understand how the first equation comes about.

Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-43-16.png

In ##dt## the particle travels by ##dr##, I considered it as a triangle with altitude ##r## and base ##dr##. On dividing the area travelled in ##dt## by ##dt## we get the above equation.
A similar argument can be applied to ##\frac 1 2 \rho^2 \frac {d\phi} {dt}## as ##\rho## is same as r and ##\rho \frac {d\phi} {dt}## is same as ##\frac {dr} {dt}##

But, I am not able to understand the 2nd equation. I can provide a similar argument for ##xv_y## but can,t seem to reason any further.
Please be kind to help.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-39-16.png
    Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-39-16.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 145
Physics news on Phys.org
The unsigned area swept out in time \delta t is approximately |\delta S| \approx \tfrac12 <br /> \|\mathbf{r} \times (\mathbf{r} + \mathbf{v}\delta t)\| = <br /> \tfrac12 \|\mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}\| |\delta t|. This is because the magnitude of the cross-product gives the area of the parallelogram bounded by \mathbf{r} and \mathbf{r} + \mathbf{v} \delta t, and the area swept out is approximately the area of a triangle which is one half of the parallelogram. Dividing by \delta t and taking the limit \delta t \to 0 gives <br /> \left|\frac{dS}{dt}\right| = \tfrac12 \|\mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}\|. This is essentially the derivation of the first formula.

To derive the second, in the case of motion in the (x,y,0) plane we can calculate \frac12\|\mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}\| either in cartesians or in plane polars using the standard formulae \begin{split}<br /> \mathbf{r} &amp;= r\mathbf{e}_r(\theta) \\<br /> \mathbf{v} &amp;= \dot r \mathbf{e}_r(\theta) + r\dot \theta \mathbf{e}_{\theta}(\theta) \end{split} where <br /> \mathbf{e}_r(\theta) \times \mathbf{e}_\theta(\theta) \equiv \mathbf{e}_z. We can then adopt the convention that S increases in the direction of increasing \theta to remove the absolute value signs.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Shreya
pasmith said:
To derive the second, in the case of motion in the (x,y,0) plane we can calculate 12‖r×v‖ either in cartesians or in plane polars using the standard formulae r=rer(θ)v=r˙er(θ)+rθ˙eθ(θ) where er(θ)×eθ(θ)≡ez. We can then adopt the convention that S increases in the direction of increasing θ to remove the absolute value signs.
Thank You so much @pasmith !
##\vec r = x \hat i + y \hat j##
##\vec v = v_x \hat i + v_y \hat j##

##\vec r \times \vec v = (x v_y - y v_x) \hat k##
##\frac {dS} {dt} = \frac 1 2 (xv_y-yv_x)##
Is the above right?
 
Yes, the above is right
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
911
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K