Archived Atomic Spectrum of an Unknown Element

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying an unknown element based on the emission of x-rays when an electron transitions from the M shell to the K shell, with a measured wavelength of 0.0897 nm. The initial calculation suggested Selenium (atomic number 34) using the energy equations, but confusion arose regarding the use of effective nuclear charge (Zeff) instead of the atomic number (Z). The participant attempted to adjust their calculations to account for Zeff, considering the electron configuration, but consistently obtained a Z value around 32.7, leading to uncertainty about the correct approach. It was noted that Bohr's theory is not applicable due to the multi-electron nature of the atom, suggesting that Moseley's equation may provide a more accurate method for solving the problem. The discussion highlights the complexities involved in accurately identifying elements through atomic spectra.
XianForce
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When an electron drops from the M shell (n = 3) to a vacancy in the K shell (n = 1), the measured wavelength of the emitted x-ray is found to be 0.0897 nm. Identify the element.

Homework Equations



E = 1240 / λ
E = (-13.6 / n^2) * (Zeff^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


According to my homework, the answer is Selenium (atomic number = 34). I initially got that answer by using: (-13.6 / 9) * Z^2 + (13.6 / 1) * Z^2 = 1240 / (.0897). Solving for Z here, I got 33.8.

But I then learned that we are supposed to use Zeff, and not simply Z. I must be misunderstanding something though, because I would then think that the equation would be:

(-13.6 / 9) * (Z - 10)^2 + (13.6 / 1) * Z^2 = 1240 / (.0897)

because there are 10 electrons in the first and second energy levels, so I thought this equation would account for that. But I keep getting a Z value around 32.7 with this which would be in between Germanium and Arsenic.

So what am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing about this problem is : Bohr's theory and his equations are not even valid here. This is not a one-electron system.

As to how one does this, I am guessing Moseley's equation is the most valid.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top