Atwood's machine height problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter tony873004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Machine
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about Atwood's machine, the user calculates the acceleration of the system using the masses m1 and m2, finding it to be approximately 1.06054 m/s². They then apply the kinematic equation to determine the height m2 rises before coming to rest, calculating a distance of 1.36 cm. However, this result is marked incorrect by the online homework system, raising questions about the accuracy of the grading. The user notes that a similar problem in the textbook yields a different height of 4 cm, despite using the same method. The conversation highlights potential discrepancies in online grading and suggests that using work-energy principles might simplify the problem.
tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
Figure 8-20 http://www.webassign.net/walker/08-20b_alt.gif

14. [Walker2 8.P.025.] For the Atwood's machine shown in Figure 8-20, suppose that m2 has an initial upward speed of v = 0.17 m/s.

How high does m2 rise above its initial position before momentarily coming to rest, given that m1 = 3.3 kg and m2 = 4.1 kg?


Here's what I did:

F_{1} = T - m_{1}g = m_{1}a
F_{2} = m_{2}g - T = m_{2}a

and since the tensions must equal each other

(m_{2} - m_{1})g = (m_{1} + m_{2})a
or
a = \frac{m_{2} - m_{1}}{m_{1} + m_{2}} g

a = \frac{4.1 - 3.3}{3.3 + 4.1} 9.81

a = 1.06054

I'm pretty confident that the answer is correct so far because the book uses this exact method in their example. Only the masses and velocity are changed. But the book's example stops at acceleration. Our problem asks for a distance, so...

d = \frac{\Delta V^2}{2a}

d = \frac{0.17^2}{2*1.06054}

d = 0.0136 m

d = 1.36 cm

But Webassign, the online homework system says WRONG :mad:

But the same problem in the book, using m_{1}=3.7 , m_{2} = 4.1 , v = 0.2 gives an answer of 4cm, which is exactly what I get using the same method. How can this method be good using the book's numbers, but wrong using the numbers in the online problem? Could the online grading be wrong? :bugeye: Wouldn't be the first time :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm not sure
 
Its much easier if you use work energy to solve this problem. Also the tensions are not equal- only in the static case but the relative position, velocity, and acceleration are.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top