Archived Calculating Back EMF of an Automobile Starter Motor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the back electromotive force (emf) of an automobile starter motor operating normally at a current of 1.9 A from a 5.5 V battery. When the motor is locked due to a broken pulley, the current increases to 8.6 A, but this scenario is not relevant for calculating back emf. The resistance of the armature is determined to be approximately 0.6395 Ω. Using the formula for back emf, it is calculated that the back emf during normal operation is 4.285 V. The final conclusion is that the back emf of the motor when running normally is 4.285 V.
Augustus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An automobile starter motor draws a current of 1.9 A from a 5.5 V battery when operating at normal speed. A broken pulley locks the armature in position, and the current increases to 8.6 A.

What was the back emf of the motor when operating normally? Answer in units of V.


Homework Equations



V=IR is the only one I can think of

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the resistance. But I don't know why it is at all relevant that the amperage should increase to 8.6 A, if the question asks for the back emf of the motor at normal operating speeds.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Augustus said:
A broken pulley locks the armature in position, and the current increases to 8.6 A.
Since the rotor is locked, there is no back emf in the armature circuit.
Hence, Vbattery=IaRarmature
∴Rarmature=5.5/8.6=0.6395Ω
When the motor is running normally,
Vbattery=IaRarmature+Eb
∴Eb=5.5-1.9*0.6395=4.285V
Back emf in normal running condition is 4.285 V.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top