Balmer Wavelength for Hydrogen-like Fe Atom (Z=26): 0.971 nm

  • Thread starter Thread starter Meekay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavelength
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the Balmer wavelength for a hydrogen-like Fe atom (Z=26) transitioning from n=3 to n=2. The correct wavelength is identified as 0.971 nm. Initial calculations using the standard formula yielded incorrect results of 654 nm and 1200 nm. The correct approach involves using the modified formula for hydrogen-like atoms, incorporating the atomic number Z. The final formula provided leads to the accurate wavelength of 0.97 nm, confirming the initial query.
Meekay
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have been having trouble with this Balmer wavelength problem and was hoping I can get a little guidance.

The question: Find the balmer wavelength (n=3 --> n=2) emitted from a hydrogen-like Fe atom (z=26)

The answer is supposed to be 0.971 nm

My attempt:

1/lambda = R(1/n'^2 - 1/n2)
Since this is a hydrogen-like atom, it should be straight forward

I get lambda = 36/5*R which comes out to be 654 nm

And if I use one of Bohrs equations: E = -Z^2(R/n^2) and E3 = E2+ (hc/lambda) I get a value of 1200 nm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured it out, my book did not give me this equation for hydrogen-like atoms:

1/lambda = R*Z^2(1/n'^2 - 1/n^2) this gives me 0.97 nm

Thanks wikipedia!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top