Banked road (find the minimum radius)

  • Thread starter Thread starter farleyknight
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum Radius
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum radius of a banked road for a car traveling at a speed of 50/3 m/s, considering the effects of friction and gravity. The key equation derived is R = v^2 / (2 * mu_s * g), where mu_s is the coefficient of static friction (0.15) and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s²). The user encountered an issue with their calculation yielding an incorrect radius of approximately 94.39 m. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between centripetal force, friction, and the banking angle in determining the correct radius.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal force and its role in circular motion
  • Knowledge of static friction and its coefficient (mu_s)
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, specifically tangent and arctangent
  • Basic algebra for solving equations involving physical quantities
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of centripetal force equations in circular motion
  • Study the effects of banking angles on vehicle dynamics
  • Learn about the role of friction in maintaining circular motion on banked curves
  • Explore advanced topics in dynamics, such as the impact of speed on required banking angles
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and dynamics, as well as engineers involved in road design and vehicle dynamics analysis.

farleyknight
Messages
143
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



y2MPs.png


I've already answered the first part. The second part is what's giving me trouble.

Homework Equations



Here's how I solved #10:

Since the car is at rest, we're only worried about the force of friction and the parallel component of gravity:

F_f = F_g * sin(theta) = m * g * sin(theta)

Since F_f = mu_s * F_N = mu_s * F_g * cos(theta) = mu_s * m * g * cos(theta)

Then:

mu_s * m * g * cos(theta) = m * g * sin(theta)

Solving for theta, we get:

mu_s = tan(theta)

Or arctan(mu_s) = theta

The Attempt at a Solution



The second situation is different. We need to know the radius, and that is only involved when we have the centripetal force (F_C).

In this case, we are worried about having enough F_C to keep the car from veering off. Now the force of friction is equal, but going in the opposite direction (the same direction as the parallel component of gravity):

F_C * cos(theta) = F_f + F_g * sin(theta)

We already have F_f = mu_s * m * g * cos(theta), and F_g * sin(theta) = m * g * sin(theta). Also, since we're dealing with centripetal force, the proper equation for acceleration is:

m * a = m * (v^2 / R)

So that gives:

F_C * cos(theta) = m * (v^2 / R) = mu_s * m * g * cos(theta) + m * g * sin(theta)

Cancelling m and dividing by cos(theta):

(v^2 / R) = mu_s * g + g * tan(theta)

Since tan(theta) = mu_s:

(v^2 / R) = 2 * mu_s * g

This equation makes sense, to me, because previously we requires the parallel gravitation component to be equal (and opposite) to force of friction. Now we require that both of those forces act together to keep the car on the road, thus giving 2 * mu_s * g.

Solving for R:

R = v^2 / (2 * mu_s * g)

Which is dimensionally correct. Punching the values into my calculator gives:

v^2 / (2 * mu_s * g) = (50/3)^2 / (2 * 0.15 * 9.81) = 94.38592517

But this was rejected :(

Any idea where my mistake is at?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
farleyknight said:

Homework Statement



y2MPs.png


I've already answered the first part. The second part is what's giving me trouble.

Homework Equations



Here's how I solved #10:

Since the car is at rest, we're only worried about the force of friction and the parallel component of gravity:

F_f = F_g * sin(theta) = m * g * sin(theta)

Since F_f = mu_s * F_N = mu_s * F_g * cos(theta) = mu_s * m * g * cos(theta)

Then:

mu_s * m * g * cos(theta) = m * g * sin(theta)

Solving for theta, we get:

mu_s = tan(theta)

Or arctan(mu_s) = theta

The Attempt at a Solution



The second situation is different. We need to know the radius, and that is only involved when we have the centripetal force (F_C).

In this case, we are worried about having enough F_C to keep the car from veering off. Now the force of friction is equal, but going in the opposite direction (the same direction as the parallel component of gravity):

F_C * cos(theta) = F_f + F_g * sin(theta)

We already have F_f = mu_s * m * g * cos(theta), and F_g * sin(theta) = m * g * sin(theta). Also, since we're dealing with centripetal force, the proper equation for acceleration is:

m * a = m * (v^2 / R)

So that gives:

F_C * cos(theta) = m * (v^2 / R) = mu_s * m * g * cos(theta) + m * g * sin(theta)

Cancelling m and dividing by cos(theta):

(v^2 / R) = mu_s * g + g * tan(theta)

Since tan(theta) = mu_s:

(v^2 / R) = 2 * mu_s * g

This equation makes sense, to me, because previously we requires the parallel gravitation component to be equal (and opposite) to force of friction. Now we require that both of those forces act together to keep the car on the road, thus giving 2 * mu_s * g.

Solving for R:

R = v^2 / (2 * mu_s * g)

Which is dimensionally correct. Punching the values into my calculator gives:

v^2 / (2 * mu_s * g) = (50/3)^2 / (2 * 0.15 * 9.81) = 94.38592517

But this was rejected :(

Any idea where my mistake is at?


When a car is traveling around a banked track, the Normal reaction force is higher than when it is parked on the track [a similar thing happens when a car is driven through a dip rather than parked in a dip]. This increases the frictional force, an Fn is bigger.
 
Yep, that's what I needed. Thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
964
Replies
4
Views
3K