Banked road (find the minimum radius)

  • Thread starter Thread starter farleyknight
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum Radius
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum radius for a banked road, considering forces acting on a car. The user correctly identifies the need to account for centripetal force and friction when determining the radius. They derive the equation R = v^2 / (2 * mu_s * g) but face issues with their calculated value being rejected. A key insight is that the normal force increases when the car is in motion, enhancing the frictional force, which is crucial for maintaining the car's trajectory on the banked track. Understanding this relationship between normal force and friction is essential for solving the problem accurately.
farleyknight
Messages
143
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



y2MPs.png


I've already answered the first part. The second part is what's giving me trouble.

Homework Equations



Here's how I solved #10:

Since the car is at rest, we're only worried about the force of friction and the parallel component of gravity:

F_f = F_g * sin(theta) = m * g * sin(theta)

Since F_f = mu_s * F_N = mu_s * F_g * cos(theta) = mu_s * m * g * cos(theta)

Then:

mu_s * m * g * cos(theta) = m * g * sin(theta)

Solving for theta, we get:

mu_s = tan(theta)

Or arctan(mu_s) = theta

The Attempt at a Solution



The second situation is different. We need to know the radius, and that is only involved when we have the centripetal force (F_C).

In this case, we are worried about having enough F_C to keep the car from veering off. Now the force of friction is equal, but going in the opposite direction (the same direction as the parallel component of gravity):

F_C * cos(theta) = F_f + F_g * sin(theta)

We already have F_f = mu_s * m * g * cos(theta), and F_g * sin(theta) = m * g * sin(theta). Also, since we're dealing with centripetal force, the proper equation for acceleration is:

m * a = m * (v^2 / R)

So that gives:

F_C * cos(theta) = m * (v^2 / R) = mu_s * m * g * cos(theta) + m * g * sin(theta)

Cancelling m and dividing by cos(theta):

(v^2 / R) = mu_s * g + g * tan(theta)

Since tan(theta) = mu_s:

(v^2 / R) = 2 * mu_s * g

This equation makes sense, to me, because previously we requires the parallel gravitation component to be equal (and opposite) to force of friction. Now we require that both of those forces act together to keep the car on the road, thus giving 2 * mu_s * g.

Solving for R:

R = v^2 / (2 * mu_s * g)

Which is dimensionally correct. Punching the values into my calculator gives:

v^2 / (2 * mu_s * g) = (50/3)^2 / (2 * 0.15 * 9.81) = 94.38592517

But this was rejected :(

Any idea where my mistake is at?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
farleyknight said:

Homework Statement



y2MPs.png


I've already answered the first part. The second part is what's giving me trouble.

Homework Equations



Here's how I solved #10:

Since the car is at rest, we're only worried about the force of friction and the parallel component of gravity:

F_f = F_g * sin(theta) = m * g * sin(theta)

Since F_f = mu_s * F_N = mu_s * F_g * cos(theta) = mu_s * m * g * cos(theta)

Then:

mu_s * m * g * cos(theta) = m * g * sin(theta)

Solving for theta, we get:

mu_s = tan(theta)

Or arctan(mu_s) = theta

The Attempt at a Solution



The second situation is different. We need to know the radius, and that is only involved when we have the centripetal force (F_C).

In this case, we are worried about having enough F_C to keep the car from veering off. Now the force of friction is equal, but going in the opposite direction (the same direction as the parallel component of gravity):

F_C * cos(theta) = F_f + F_g * sin(theta)

We already have F_f = mu_s * m * g * cos(theta), and F_g * sin(theta) = m * g * sin(theta). Also, since we're dealing with centripetal force, the proper equation for acceleration is:

m * a = m * (v^2 / R)

So that gives:

F_C * cos(theta) = m * (v^2 / R) = mu_s * m * g * cos(theta) + m * g * sin(theta)

Cancelling m and dividing by cos(theta):

(v^2 / R) = mu_s * g + g * tan(theta)

Since tan(theta) = mu_s:

(v^2 / R) = 2 * mu_s * g

This equation makes sense, to me, because previously we requires the parallel gravitation component to be equal (and opposite) to force of friction. Now we require that both of those forces act together to keep the car on the road, thus giving 2 * mu_s * g.

Solving for R:

R = v^2 / (2 * mu_s * g)

Which is dimensionally correct. Punching the values into my calculator gives:

v^2 / (2 * mu_s * g) = (50/3)^2 / (2 * 0.15 * 9.81) = 94.38592517

But this was rejected :(

Any idea where my mistake is at?


When a car is traveling around a banked track, the Normal reaction force is higher than when it is parked on the track [a similar thing happens when a car is driven through a dip rather than parked in a dip]. This increases the frictional force, an Fn is bigger.
 
Yep, that's what I needed. Thanks! :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top