Can Bedini Free Energy Motors Really Defy the Laws of Physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the claim that Bedini Free Energy Motors can produce more output than input, which is asserted to defy the laws of physics. Participants express skepticism, emphasizing that such claims are not scientifically valid and that there is no evidence for free energy. The mention of a patented process is criticized as a sign of misunderstanding about patents. Overall, the consensus is that the concept is a bluff and not credible. The thread concludes with a definitive statement that free energy does not exist.
agabrielauto
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Is it true? Does this really defies a law of physics? (More output than input). or is it bluff...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
From [crackpot link deleted]

"And it is a patented process in this system, so I cannot divulge the exact processes involved"

Perhaps next he can learn what a patent is. Then his investors will REALLY be impressed.

Seriously, anybody that writes that about a patent isn't exactly the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
agabrielauto said:
Is it true?
No.
agabrielauto said:
Does this really defies a law of physics? (More output than input).
Yes. Several, actually.
agabrielauto said:
or is it bluff...
That's one word for it.
 
negitron said:
That's one word for it.
There's a more more appropriate one that starts with the same letter.
 
Yes, but the forum won't let me type it. :frown:
 
There is no free energy. Thread locked.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top