Betatron, Electron accerating at a constant radius

forceface
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron with speed v, undergoing cyclotron motion in a transverse magnetic field B(r) at cyclotron radius r0, given r0 = mv/[eB(r0)], can be accelerated by ramping the B field in time.
(a) Since magnetic fields do no work,what is increasing thwe kinetic energy of the electron?
(b) Show that if the magnetic field at r0 is half of the average across the orbit,
B(r0,t)= 1/(2πr02)∫B(r,t) da
then the radius r0 of the orbit must be constant in time. Assume nonrelativistic speeds

1. The attempt at a solution
(a) This is the easy part, since the magnetic field is changing in time an electric field is induced and that is what is increasing the kinetic energy of the electron.
(b) I have worked out why the given equation is true but I would rather not write the whole thing out. So given this equation how do I prove that the radius is constant in time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't tried working this out, but I'll suggest you could try to show that ##dr_0/dt = 0##.
 
When I try your suggestions I come up with B dv/dt = dB/dt v. But I am still not sure how this along with the intergral identity helps show what I want.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top