Block moved by spring - Determine speed

AI Thread Summary
A 2.5 kg block attached to a spring with a constant of 19.6 N/m is subjected to a constant 20 N force, causing it to stretch. The discussion revolves around calculating the block's speed after moving 0.900 m from equilibrium on a frictionless surface. Participants suggest incorporating the work done by the applied force to determine the spring's potential energy change. Clarification is sought on the meaning of "0.900 m from equilibrium," with some expressing confusion over the problem's wording. The use of energy conservation principles is recommended to solve for the block's speed effectively.
starfish794
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
A 2.5 kg block at rest on a tabletop is attached to a horizontal spring having constant 19.6 N/m. The spring is initially unstretched. A constant 20 N horizontal force is applied to the object, causing the spring to stretch. Determine the speed of the block after it has moved 0.900 m from equilibrium if the surface between the block and tabletop is frictionless.

I tried using the formula v= square root of k/m*(A^2-x^2) and got 2.52 which is the wrong answer. The 20 N force must need to be included in the problem in some way but I can't figure out how.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly do you mean by '0.900 m from equilibrium'? Do you mean, the point at which the spring was unstreched?
 
That's what I took it to mean. I think the wording in the whole problem is bad.
 
starfish794 said:
That's what I took it to mean. I think the wording in the whole problem is bad.

Okay, here's a hint: use the fact that the work of the force along the unknown displacement (i.e. extension of the spring) equals the change of the spring's potential energy. You should be able to calculate the stretch of the spring from that equation. Further on, by knowing the initial displacement, use energy conservation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top