Boatswans Chair pulley Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryansf98
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding a pulley system involving a man and a chair, focusing on the forces at play. Key points include the realization that tension in the rope must equal the weight of the man and chair, and that multiple ropes can affect the net force calculations. The participant clarifies that there are three ropes contributing to the upward force, leading to a net force equation that incorporates these tensions. The importance of drawing a free body diagram is emphasized to visualize the forces acting on the system. Ultimately, the conclusion is that tension remains constant throughout the ropes if the pulleys are massless and frictionless.
Ryansf98
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The question has been screenshotted, along with the given diagram. Basic stuff I know, but I can't seem to get my head around pulley systems. T
Screenshot (44).png


Screenshot (43).png

Homework Equations


F(net) = m ⋅ a(system)

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand the rope to be considered inextensible. Also, I understand that the tension must equal the weight of the man & chair, but beyond that I don't know how to break it down.

I labelled a reference frame with x being positive down.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ryansf98,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Ryansf98 said:
I understand that the tension must equal the weight of the man & chair
What leads you to that conclusion?

Have you made a free body diagram of the man&chair?
 
gneill said:
Hi Ryansf98,

Welcome to Physics Forums!What leads you to that conclusion?

Have you made a free body diagram of the man&chair?

I just read that over and now realize it doesn't make sense, as equal tension & weight would mean an acceleration of 0m/s^2 wouldn't it? What I meant was that tension must be equal throughout the rope.
 
Ryansf98 said:
I just read that over and now realize it doesn't make sense, as equal tension & weight would mean an acceleration of 0m/s^2 wouldn't it? What I meant was that tension must be equal throughout the rope.
Okay. Draw the resulting free body diagram for the man&chair.
 
gneill said:
Hi Ryansf98,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Thank you by the way! I've used it for sometime looking at existing threads, but I couldn't find an existing problem like this one so thought it'd be a good time to start my own account!
 
gneill said:
Okay. Draw the resulting free body diagram for the man&chair.

I done that, labelling F(down) as 200N + mg, => F(down total) = 887N.

Regarding the tension, I labelled T moving up from the man to the smaller pulley. Would that then split into 1/2T either way up the pulley, or would it remain T?

I also labelled T pointing up on the rope which the man pulls down on.
 
gneill said:
Okay. Draw the resulting free body diagram for the man&chair.

I realize I jumped a gun a little there as you only suggested a free body diagram for the man and chair. For this, I labelled mg down and T up towards the smaller pulley. Would I in fact insert 200 N here also?
 
Ryansf98 said:
I realize I jumped a gun a little there as you only suggested a free body diagram for the man and chair. For this, I labelled mg down and T up towards the smaller pulley. Would I in fact insert 200 N here also?
How many ropes attach to the man&chair? If each has a tension T, what's the net force upwards?
 
gneill said:
How many ropes attach to the man&chair? If each has a tension T, what's the net force upwards?

One rope attached directly to the man and chair, therefore T up? Also, would 200N be T, due to Newtons 3rd Law?

Therefore, Net Force Up = 200N?
 
  • #10
gneill said:
How many ropes attach to the man&chair? If each has a tension T, what's the net force upwards?

In fact, there are 3 ropes above the man and pulley, therefore F(up) = 3T.

T = 200N as the man exerts this force down the rope and so the rope exerts this force up on him.

That means that F(net of the system) = mg - 3T, => 686.7 - (3*200) = 86.7N downwards.

F = ma, a= 86.7/70, => a = 1.24 m/s^2?
 
  • #11
Ryansf98 said:
One rope attached directly to the man and chair, therefore T up? Also, would 200N be T, due to Newtons 3rd Law?

Therefore, Net Force Up = 200N?
No, there are two ropes connected to the man and chair: One he holds directly, one connected to the chair.

The one he holds has a tension T = 200 N. What's the tension in the other rope? (consider a FBD of the small pulley).
 
  • #12
Ryansf98 said:
In fact, there are 3 ropes above the man and pulley, therefore F(up) = 3T.

T = 200N as the man exerts this force down the rope and so the rope exerts this force up on him.

That means that F(net of the system) = mg - 3T, => 686.7 - (3*200) = 86.7N downwards.

F = ma, a= 86.7/70, => a = 1.24 m/2^2?
Yes! That's much better!
 
  • #13
gneill said:
Yes! That's much better!

So generally no matter what, each rope has a tension T throughout the system, even if the rope reaches a pulley and looks to go into 2 separate ropes?

Thanks for the help!
 
  • #14
Ryansf98 said:
So generally no matter what, each rope has a tension T throughout the system, even if the rope reaches a pulley and looks to go into 2 separate ropes?
If the pulleys are massless and frictionless, then continuous ropes have the same tension. When separate ropes meet at a pulley, their tensions sum (vector sum).
 
  • #15
gneill said:
If the pulleys are massless and frictionless, then continuous ropes have the same tension. When separate ropes meet at a pulley, their tensions sum (vector sum).

Makes sense. Again thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Back
Top