Bohr Model applied to Excitons

AI Thread Summary
An exciton, modeled as a hydrogen-like atom, consists of a bound electron-hole pair in a semiconductor, with key parameters adjusted for the semiconductor's permittivity and effective mass. The estimated radius for an exciton in silicon is approximately 4.2 nm, while the interatomic distance in silicon is around 0.235 nm, indicating that the exciton radius is significantly larger than the atomic separation. The binding energy of the exciton is compared to the average kinetic energy of silicon atoms, suggesting that exciton binding energy is substantial enough to be relevant in the context of thermal energy. The discussion also emphasizes that electrostatic potential energy is much greater than gravitational potential energy, justifying the neglect of gravity in this scenario. Overall, the calculations and comparisons provide insights into the behavior of excitons in silicon.
adamaero
Messages
109
Reaction score
1
An exciton is a bound electron-hole pair (in a semiconductor). For this problem, think of an exciton as a hydrogen-like atom, with a negatively charged electron and positively charged hole orbiting each other.

The permittivity of free space (ε0) is replaced with permittivity of the semiconductor (ε = 12).
The mass of the electron is replaced with the effective mass of the electron-hole pair.

1. Homework Statement (bold below is what I really need help on)

A) Estimate the radius in nm and the ground state energy in eV for an exciton in Si.

B) Approximately how large is the separation between atoms in a crystal of silicon? How does the radius compare with this number?

C) Silicon atoms have an average kinetic energy of T*kB. How does the exciton binding energy (E1) compare with this number? What does this mean?

D) All this is about electrostatic potential energy. Prove that it's reasonable to neglect the gravitational potential energy.

me = 9.1*10-31
eV = 1.602×10−19 J (N*m)
h = 6.626*10-34
ħ = 1.055*10-34
a0 = 0.0529 nm
ε*ε0 = 1.0359*10-10

permittivity of silicon = εSi = kSiε0 where k = dielectric constant

effective masses
me* = 0.26me
mh* = 0.36me

Homework Equations


r = mek2e4/(πħ3)

me*mh*/(me* + mh*) = 0.15me

r = n2h2*1.0359*10-10/(z*π*meffectivee2)

The Attempt at a Solution


A)
upload_2016-10-22_10-2-33.png


12*a0/0.15 = 4.2nm (n2/z)

upload_2016-10-22_10-3-17.png


Ry = -13.6eV

B) I do not remember chemistry much. How is the separation between silicon atoms found?

C) 300*1.38*10-23 m2kg/s2 = 4.14*10-23
E1 = ?

D) PEelectrostatic = kqQ/r
images.slideplayer.com/22/6421287/slides/slide_3.jpg
FE = qE
Fg = mg
∴ qE = mg
& as long as qE/m is much larger than g, gravity can be ignored.

Sources
http://www.course-notes.org/book/export/html/10891
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/97/Exciton_energy_levels.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
adamaero said:
Ry = -13.6eV
You get the same Rydberg constant as for hydrogen?

adamaero said:
B) I do not remember chemistry much. How is the separation between silicon atoms found?
Google :smile: There is no way to find that by first principles, so just Google "silicon interatomic distance".

adamaero said:
C) 300*1.38*10-23 m2kg/s2 = 4.14*10-23
E1 = ?
That should be the binding energy. Do you remember how to find that for hydrogen?
 
  • Like
Likes adamaero
Oh yes, sorry, with ε:
The energy (for part A) is mee4/[8(h*1.0359*10-10)2]
= (9.1*10^-31)(e^4)/[8*((6.626*10^-34)*(1.0359*10^-10))^2]
= 1.32*1057
Was that suppose to be a different mass?

Thank you. I did Google it. Although, I either searched the wrong phrase or thought it wasn't simple from the results that came up earlier.
atomic radius = 0.132 nm
lattice parameter = 0.543 nm
nearest neighbor distance = 0.235 nm
Looks like the calculation before (4.2 nm) is wrong?

The binding energy of an electron to the nucleus in the hydrogen atom is 13.6 eV.
So the binding energy is the absolute value of Rydberg energy??
 
BE=(mp+me-mH)*c2
BE = (938MeV/c2 + 0.511MeV/c2 - 938.3MeV/c2)*c2 =
(938.484+ 0.511 - 938.783)*10^6
= 212keV

938.783 MeV (mass of hydrogen)
1.673e-27 kg (mass of proton)
>> 1 eV = 1.602e-19 J <<
>> 1 J = m3 kg / s2 <<
[(1.673e-27)/(1.602e-19)]*c2
= 9.3989e8
= 939.89e6
= 939.89 MeV
 
sol.

A) The 4.2nm (n2/z) is correct. The energy is found this way: E = m*e4/(8h2ε2), but
B) 0.235 nm or 0.543 nm means that there are multiple atoms in-between each
C) This is the same E1, but can be modified from more general E1 = me4/(8h2ε02) = -13.6 eV... E = E1*(mT/m)/[(ε/ε0)2]
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top