Bond sizes in organic chemistry

AI Thread Summary
In organic chemistry, the bond lengths for C-C and C=C are approximately 154 pm and 134 pm, respectively, indicating that a double bond is significantly shorter than a single bond. C-H bonds are longer than C-C bonds, with C-H measuring about 109 pm. C=O bonds are also shorter than C=C bonds, with a length of around 127 pm. When building models, the atomic radii show that oxygen is smaller than carbon, but the difference is not significant enough to affect model representation. Therefore, using a color code with black for carbon and red for oxygen is appropriate for model construction.
decamij
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I know that a double bond has the two atoms closer to each other than a single bond. I have to build an organic acid model for chemistry and would like to know:
- Is there a ratio between the lengths of C-C bonds to C=C bonds?
- Are C-H bonds closer together than C-C bonds?
- Are C=O bonds closer together than C=C bonds?
- If I'm building a model out of styrofoam balls and sticks, would C and O atoms be essentially the same size (i know O has a smaller atomic radius than C, but is it significant) --> i intend on using a colour code (black - C, red - O)

The first question is my top priority. Any help would make a huge difference - thanx!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
decamij said:
I have to build an organic acid model for chemistry and would like to know:
- Is there a ratio between the lengths of C-C bonds to C=C bonds?

From what i know of,it's roughly 2.That is the simple bond is twice as "long" as the double one.

decamij said:
- Are C-H bonds closer together than C-C bonds?

No,it's the nature of the bond that is essential:in this simple sigma bonds for both situations...

decamij said:
- Are C=O bonds closer together than C=C bonds?

I see no reason why they should be different...One sigma,one pi,double bond...

decamij said:
If I'm building a model out of styrofoam balls and sticks, would C and O atoms be essentially the same size (i know O has a smaller atomic radius than C, but is it significant) --> i intend on using a colour code (black - C, red - O)

No,there is no significant radius difference.You can put the O atom a bit bigger,but not significantly...

Daniel.
 
Dexter, that's not right !
decamij said:
I know that a double bond has the two atoms closer to each other than a single bond. I have to build an organic acid model for chemistry and would like to know:
- Is there a ratio between the lengths of C-C bonds to C=C bonds?
- Are C-H bonds closer together than C-C bonds?
- Are C=O bonds closer together than C=C bonds?

These are roughly the bond lengths of the various combinations that you might need (in picometers) :

H--N 101
H--O 96
O--O 148

C--C 154
C=C 134
C\equivC 120

c--H 109
C--N 147
C--O 143
C--Cl 177
C--Br 194

Empirical atomic radii of various atoms (in pm) are roughly ("atomic radius" is as such, a very vague term as it can be defined and measured in different ways) :

H 25
C 70
N 65
O 60
Cl 100
Br 115

Since the bond length is defined as the internuclear distance (ie : the sum of the covalent radii, in the case of a single bond) it does depend on the size of the atoms involved.

If you are using styrofoam balls and sticks, remember that the length of stick exposed is given by :
length~exposed = bond~length - (radius1 + radius2).
If the sum of the radii equals (or exceeds) the bond length, then no part of the stick will be exposed, and the balls will have to be touching each other. In fact, if the bond legth is greater than the sum of the radii (eg : C=C), you will have to flatten part of the C atoms (the balls) to make the distance correct.


If I'm building a model out of styrofoam balls and sticks, would C and O atoms be essentially the same size (i know O has a smaller atomic radius than C, but is it significant) --> i intend on using a colour code (black - C, red - O)

The first question is my top priority. Any help would make a huge difference - thanx!

Yes, O is smaller. See the numbers above, for the atomic radii.

Another way of making such models involves using small balls (all of the same size, but different colors) to represent the atoms, but leave out information about the atomic radii. By making the balls small compared to the length of the sticks, you only have to worry about bond lengths, which will now be equal to the lengths of the sticks.
 
Last edited:
I forgot to include

C=O 127 pm
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top