Calculate acceleration of a vehicle.

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the acceleration of a vehicle with a power of 70 bhp and a tractive force of 498N, the mass of the vehicle (375 kg) is also needed. The initial acceleration can be determined using the formula a = F/m, where F is the tractive force. For subsequent acceleration, engine torque must be converted to force, and dynamic forces like drag and friction complicate the calculations. Downforce primarily affects drag rather than direct acceleration. The acceleration will decrease over time as power loss due to friction increases with speed.
nazo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello,

i need to calculate acceleration of a vehicle. I have power (70 bhp), Tractive force (498N). Can someone help me please. I know i should use dv/dt but i can't remember how to do differential equations.

Also I need the formula to include downforce as I am designing a rear wing. does someone know the formula.

thanks.
Nazario.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nazo said:
hello,

i need to calculate acceleration of a vehicle. I have power (70 bhp), Tractive force (498N). Can someone help me please. I know i should use dv/dt but i can't remember how to do differential equations.

For the first part,are u sure this is all the data??
I men,u have the force,u need the mass.Unfortunately,the engine power will give the product between the tractive force and the velocity.So u can find the velocity.But i can't see a way of finding the acceleration...
:confused:

Daniel.
 
i have the weight 375 kg, i need the force... hmm... i onloy have tractive force. i might need the total force. how do i do that?

thanks.
 
Initial acceleration is always easy: its determined by the traction (since virtually any car is capable of spinning its wheels). a=f/m

After that (basically, after shifting out of first gear), you need the engine torque (or, more useful, torque at the wheel) - convert that to force and apply f=ma again and you can get an acceleration curve.

Downforce does not affect acceleration except in that it creates drag. And adding drag to this question makes it very complicated (and probably not solvable without a wind tunnel). Dynamic forces inside the drive-train (angular acceleration of the components) also complicates things.
 
Last edited:
nazo said:
I need to calculate acceleration of a vehicle. I have power (70 bhp), Tractive force (498N). Can someone help me please. I know i should use dv/dt but i can't remember how to do differential equations.
The acceleration has to be a function of time because the rate of power loss due to friction is a function of speed (ie. d/dt(P_f) = d/dt (F*s) = F ds/dt = Fv)
So use:
F*v = P

Since the force is: F = ma + \mu_kmg and v = at you have:

P = Fat = ma^2t + \mu_kmgat

You should be able to solve this quadratic equation for a (in terms of t). The acceleration will decline until the power output (Fv) is equal to the friction force * v.

AM
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top