Calculate acceleration of a vehicle.

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the acceleration of a vehicle with a power of 70 bhp and a tractive force of 498N, the mass of the vehicle (375 kg) is also needed. The initial acceleration can be determined using the formula a = F/m, where F is the tractive force. For subsequent acceleration, engine torque must be converted to force, and dynamic forces like drag and friction complicate the calculations. Downforce primarily affects drag rather than direct acceleration. The acceleration will decrease over time as power loss due to friction increases with speed.
nazo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello,

i need to calculate acceleration of a vehicle. I have power (70 bhp), Tractive force (498N). Can someone help me please. I know i should use dv/dt but i can't remember how to do differential equations.

Also I need the formula to include downforce as I am designing a rear wing. does someone know the formula.

thanks.
Nazario.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nazo said:
hello,

i need to calculate acceleration of a vehicle. I have power (70 bhp), Tractive force (498N). Can someone help me please. I know i should use dv/dt but i can't remember how to do differential equations.

For the first part,are u sure this is all the data??
I men,u have the force,u need the mass.Unfortunately,the engine power will give the product between the tractive force and the velocity.So u can find the velocity.But i can't see a way of finding the acceleration...
:confused:

Daniel.
 
i have the weight 375 kg, i need the force... hmm... i onloy have tractive force. i might need the total force. how do i do that?

thanks.
 
Initial acceleration is always easy: its determined by the traction (since virtually any car is capable of spinning its wheels). a=f/m

After that (basically, after shifting out of first gear), you need the engine torque (or, more useful, torque at the wheel) - convert that to force and apply f=ma again and you can get an acceleration curve.

Downforce does not affect acceleration except in that it creates drag. And adding drag to this question makes it very complicated (and probably not solvable without a wind tunnel). Dynamic forces inside the drive-train (angular acceleration of the components) also complicates things.
 
Last edited:
nazo said:
I need to calculate acceleration of a vehicle. I have power (70 bhp), Tractive force (498N). Can someone help me please. I know i should use dv/dt but i can't remember how to do differential equations.
The acceleration has to be a function of time because the rate of power loss due to friction is a function of speed (ie. d/dt(P_f) = d/dt (F*s) = F ds/dt = Fv)
So use:
F*v = P

Since the force is: F = ma + \mu_kmg and v = at you have:

P = Fat = ma^2t + \mu_kmgat

You should be able to solve this quadratic equation for a (in terms of t). The acceleration will decline until the power output (Fv) is equal to the friction force * v.

AM
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top