Calculate Angle for Multiple Polarisers to Reduce Intensity <10%

Click For Summary
To achieve a total rotation of 45° with multiple polarising filters while ensuring intensity reduction remains below 10%, the angle between the filters must be calculated using the formula I=Imaxcos²(n(θ/n)). The initial attempt yielded 9 filters at 5 degrees each, resulting in an intensity of 0.933, which is acceptable. However, it was later clarified that this is not the smallest integer solution, as the angle does not need to be a whole number. The realization that radians were being used incorrectly led to a reevaluation of the calculations. Correcting this approach is essential for finding the optimal configuration of polarizers.
Mnemonic
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You use a sequence of ideal polarising filters, each with its axis making the same angle with the axis of the previous filter, to rotate the plane of polarisation of a polarised light beam by a total of 45°. You wish to have an intensity reduction no larger than 10%.

What is the angle between multiple polarisers?

Homework Equations


I=Imaxcos2(θ)

The Attempt at a Solution


For multiple polarisers I=Imaxcos2*n(θ/n) where n is an integer

So I=cos2*n(θ/n) with I>0.9

The only integer solutions I was able to obtain was 9 polarisers separated by 5 degrees (n=9). This would give I=0.933 which is less than 10% loss if Imax=1.

However, this doesn't appear to be giving me the correct solution. What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mnemonic said:
So I=cos2*n(θ/n) with I>0.9

The only integer solutions I was able to obtain was 9 polarisers separated by 5 degrees (n=9).
Using the formula, I find that n = 9 is not the smallest integer value of n that will work. (θ does not need to be an integer number of degrees.)
 
  • Like
Likes Mnemonic
TSny said:
Using the formula, I find that n = 9 is not the smallest integer value of n that will work. (θ does not need to be an integer number of degrees.)
Was using radians in solution. Thanks for making me look back and double-check!
 
OK. Good.
 
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...