Calculate Earth's Angular Momentum in Solar Orbit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular momentum of Earth in its solar orbit, with initial attempts yielding incorrect results. The participant modeled Earth as a particle due to its size relative to its orbit and used formulas involving angular momentum, inertia, and average linear speed. Errors in calculations were identified, particularly the omission of mass in the angular momentum formula. After re-evaluating the approach and incorporating symbolic math, the participant successfully calculated the angular momentum as 2.67 x 10^40 kg*m²/s. The conversation emphasizes the importance of checking calculations and using symbolic math for accuracy.
MissEuropa
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A)Calculate the magnitude of the angular momentum of the Earth in a circular orbit around the sun.

B) Is it reasonable to model it as a particle?
Yes, considering the size of the Earth in comparison of its orbit around the sun it is reasonable to model it is a particle.

Homework Equations


L = I*ω (when considering the Earth as a rigid body)
L=r*p
I=mE*rE


The Attempt at a Solution


Assuming the Earth has a completely circular orbit:
The Earth's orbit is 2∏ radians, it completes this orbit in one year.
1 year = 3.145*107 s
2∏/3.156*107 = 1.99*10-7rad/s
Average linear speed = ω*r (radius of orbit which is 1AU or 1.49*1011
(1.99*107)*(1.49*1011)=2.977*1018m/s

So, using the formula L=r x p
(1.49*1011)*(2.977*1018)*sin90°=4.45*1029m^2/s

But, this was not the answer masteringphysics was looking for.

So, using the formula L=Iω
I calculated I (mass of the Earth*radius) = (3.81*1031)*(1.99*10-7) = 7.58*1024 kg*m2/s

And that's also not the answer masteringphysics was looking for.
I'm not sure if I made a mistake somewhere in my calculations or if I'm not using the right values for mass, radius of Earth etc. Because Earth's orbit is non circular I'm not sure at what point in Earth's orbit they wanted us to consider as the radius. I choose one AU because it's an averaged value.

Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MissEuropa said:
Average linear speed = ω*r (radius of orbit which is 1AU or 1.49*1011
(1.99*107)*(1.49*1011)=2.977*1018m/s
Always check your answers for sanity. What is the speed of light? This number is obviously wrong. In fact, it is exactly 14 orders of magnitude wrong. That should give you a hint.
 
Last edited:
MissEuropa said:
Assuming the Earth has a completely circular orbit:
The Earth's orbit is 2∏ radians, it completes this orbit in one year.
1 year = 3.145*107 s
2∏/3.156*107 = 1.99*10-7rad/s
Average linear speed = ω*r (radius of orbit which is 1AU or 1.49*1011
(1.99*107)*(1.49*1011)=2.977*1018m/s

So, using the formula L=r x p
(1.49*1011)*(2.977*1018)*sin90°=4.45*1029m^2/s
Momentum has units of mass*velocity or mass*length/time. Angular momentum has units of mass*length2/time. Where's the mass in your answer?
 
D H said:
Momentum has units of mass*velocity or mass*length/time. Angular momentum has units of mass*length2/time. Where's the mass in your answer?

Just caught that. I'm reworking now and I'll update soon. :-) thanks for the help
 
giustra199 said:
Congrats!http://www.infoocean.info/avatar1.jpg

Thankies!
So, I started from the beginning again, as not to confuse myself. Calculated the inertia of the Earth (which is why I was missing a mass component in my final answer) and got it right.

Symbolic math is the way to go for the most part, then plugging in numbers afterward.
I ended up with 2.67*1040 kg*m2/s

Thanks for the help again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
MissEuropa said:
Symbolic math is the way to go for the most part, then plugging in numbers afterward.
Absolutely. Most students never seem to learn that.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top