Calculate electric field at origin, with 3 charges

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field at the origin due to three charges, the magnitudes and distances of the charges must be determined first. The electric field contributions from each charge are calculated using the formula E = kq/r², with k being the electrostatic constant. The direction of the electric field vectors is influenced by the sign of each charge, where positive charges create outward fields and negative charges create inward fields. The resultant electric field is found by vectorially adding the contributions, considering both magnitude and direction. Understanding the vector nature of electric fields is crucial for accurately determining the net electric field at a point.
adca14
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three charges, +2.5\muC, -4.8\muC & -6.3\muC
are located at (-0.20m, 0.15m), (0.50m, -0.35m) and (-0.42m, -0.32m) respectively. What is the electric field at the origin?
q1 = +2.5\muC
q2 = -4.8\muC
q3 = -6.3\muC

Homework Equations


a^{}2 + b^{}2 = c^{}2
v_{}x = magnitude \timescos(\theta)
v_{}y = magnitude \timessin(\theta)
E = \frac{kq}{r^{}2}
law of cosines
k= 9x10^9

The Attempt at a Solution


first i found the hypotenuse for the three charges.
q1 = .25m
q2 = .6103m
q3 = .5280m

then i used the formula for magnitude of an electric field
where k is the constant, q was my three charges, and the radius were my three hypotenuses
my results were:
q1 = 360000
q2 = 115983
q3 = 203383

i used the law of cosines to get \theta
my three angles were:
1 = 36.8
2 = 35
3 = 37.3

to find Ex, i multiplied the product of my magnitudes by the cosine of its respective angle:
my results:
1 = 288263
2 = 95007
3 = 161785
i added these up and got 545055, the book says 2.2x10^5!
i didnt bother doing y, since I am completely lost!
Please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't the direction of q3 carry a negative sign ... i.e. pointing toward the right from the origin?

Hence |E1| + |E2| - |E3| along x?

288 + 95 - 161 = 222
 
yeah q3 has a negative sign.
So is the way i did the problem correct?
 
I got another problem I am trying to solve for y, but when i add everything up i get + 443958, not -4.1x10^5 like the book says.

P.S. how do i know which ones to add, and which ones to subtract?
 
adca14 said:
I got another problem I am trying to solve for y, but when i add everything up i get + 443958, not -4.1x10^5 like the book says.

P.S. how do i know which ones to add, and which ones to subtract?

Remember the E-Field is a vector field.

So you not only need to account for the sign of the charge, but you also must take into account where the point that you are taking the E-Field at is relative to the charge.

A positive charge has radial outward field. A negative charge is radial inward. So depending on which side you are and whether it is a + or - is what determines the sign of the |E|, not simply which quadrant it may lay in.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top