Calculate frequency based on change in hanging mass

AI Thread Summary
An elastic cord vibrates at 3.0 Hz with a 0.60 kg mass, and the goal is to find its frequency with a 0.38 kg mass. The frequency is proportional to the inverse square root of the mass, leading to the equation freq ∝ 1/√m. Initial calculations attempted to find the spring constant k, but this approach was deemed unnecessarily complex. A simpler method involves adjusting the frequency based on the change in mass, resulting in a frequency closer to the book's answer of 3.8 Hz. The key takeaway is to utilize the proportional relationship rather than calculating k.
EroAlchemist
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An elastic cord vibrates with a frequency of 3.0 Hz with a mass of 0.60kg is hung from it. What is its frequency when only 0.38kg hangs from it?


Homework Equations


freq = (1/2Pi)*sqrt(k/m)

The Attempt at a Solution



freq = 3.0Hz = (1/2Pi)*sqrt(k/0.60kg)
= (4Pi^2)(9Hz)(.60kg) = k = 853.7 Nm

use k to calc freq:
freq = (1/2Pi)*sqrt(853.7Nm/0.38kg)
Freq = 7.54 Hz

Book gives correct answer as being 3.8 Hz. This seemed simple enough, but I'm obviously missing something. Thanks much for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi EroAlchemist! :wink:

(have a square-root: √ and a pi: π )

the only thing that matters is that it's proportional to 1/√m

nothing else matters, there's no need to do all those calculations to find k and then to eliminate it again …

it just takes time and risks making a mistake!

start again :smile:
 
Thanks tiny-tim!
I used f = (1/2π)(√1/.22kg) = 3.35 Hz
That's a closer answer to the book's 3.8Hz answer. However, by not figuring k using the information that the .60kg weight made the spring oscillate at a frequency of 3Hz, I'm not sure how to use the information about the .60kg weight and the 3Hz frequency.

Thanks for the √ and the π
:)
EA
 
it's proportional to 1/√m …

start with 3 Hz, then adjust for the different m
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top