Calculate Linear Velocity: 180 deg/s & 0.5 m

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the linear velocity of the foot given an angular velocity of 180 degrees/s and a distance of 0.5 m from the knee joint, the formula used is linear velocity = angular velocity (w) x radius (r). Converting 180 degrees to radians gives approximately 3.14 rad/s, leading to a linear velocity of about 1.57 m/s when multiplied by the radius. There were some concerns about unit handling, particularly regarding the use of degrees in the calculation. It is noted that radians can be considered dimensionless in this context, simplifying the calculation. The final answer, rounded to two decimal places, is 1.57 m/s.
PepperABLF12
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the linear velocity of the foot if the angular velocity of the dynamometer was 180 degrees/s and the distance from the knee joint to the foot is 0.5 m. Give your answer rounded to two decimal places in m.s-1. (Do not include units in answer).

Homework Equations



linear velocity = angular velocity (w) x radius (r).
linear velocity = w x r.

The Attempt at a Solution



w = 180 degree/s
r = 0.5m
linear velocity = ?

linear velocity = w x r
linear velocity = 180 x 0.5
linear velocity = 90 degrees/s

To find radians, 90/57.3 = 1.57 m/s

Is this correct? And in the right units?

Please help and thank you! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, your relevant equation gives ##0.5 {\rm m}\, \times \,\pi \, {\rm rad/s} = 1.57 \,{\rm m/s}## straightforward.

But your dealing with units is a bit messy. Especially the 90 degrees/s is objectionable. A linear velocity has dimension length/time. The numerics are fine, but the dimensions should read something like: degrees/s / radians/degree x meters/radian

THe writer of the exercise doesn't want to be bothered by these considerations, so he/she asks for a number only.

In my first sentence I let the radians disappear, you could say that I cheat too. My defence is: radians is arc per radius, so length/length and thereby dimensionless: it can be skipped in dimensional expressions.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you so much! Great help :)
 
It is easier to understand if you convert to radians first and then calculate the linear velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top