Calculate the moment of inertia of a uniform triangular lamina of mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia of a uniform isosceles triangular lamina about its axis of symmetry. The initial incorrect assumption was that the moment of inertia is 1/2 * m * b². The correct approach involves using a double integral to express mass in terms of x, leading to the correct result of M * b² / 6. The integration process accounts for the mass distribution along the axis, confirming that height does not influence the moment of inertia. The contributor successfully resolved their errors and arrived at the correct solution.
mattgad
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the moment of inertia of a uniform triangular lamina of mass m in the shape of an isosceles triangle with base 2b and height h, about its axis of symmetry.

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried various things for this and never get the correct answer, 1/2*m*b^2.
I'm beginning to think this may involve a double integral.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think ½mb² is the right result.

Here is a similar example I did earlier:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=278184

In this case I think you would attack the sum of the x²*dm by observing that you can construct m in terms of x as something like h*(1-x/b) so that you arrive at an integral over an expression something like (hx² -x³/b)*dx.

At the end you will be able note that the area of the lamina triangle times the implied density ρ yields you an M total mass in the product that defines your moment.
 
I have coded this problem as a double integral in Maple.

> x(y):=b*(1-y/h);
> rho:=M/(b*h);
> dJ:=int(rho*z^2,z=0..x(y));
> J:=2*int(dJ,y=0..h);

In the first line, the right boundary is defined.
In the second line, the mass density is expressed.
In the third line, the integration in the x-direction is performed from the axis of symmetry to the right edge
In the fourth line, the integration is performed in the y-direction from bottom to top. The result is M*b^2/6. It is reasonable that h should not be in the result. The altitude should not affect this function, only the base width which describes how far the mass is distributed off the axis of rotation.
 
Happily algebraic methods arrive at the same result.
 
I did actually mean to put mb^2 / 6 in my first post. Thanks for replies. Last night I managed to get it myself as well after spotting errors in my work. Thanks.
 
how about the inertia product of this problem?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top