Calculate Torque Balance to Find the Angle of a String

AI Thread Summary
To find the angle of the string using the torque balance equation, the equation Wga = mgbsin(angle) is suggested. The correct approach involves using the inverse sine function to isolate the angle, specifically sin^-1(Wa/mb). There were initial errors in calculations, but after adjustments, a value of 56 degrees was obtained. Additionally, for the predicted values of P_x and P_y, it is suggested that both would be zero since there is no torque acting on the system. Understanding these calculations is crucial for accurately determining the angle and forces involved.
just.karl
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/just-karl/2407404197/" title="IMG_8600 by Karl W., on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2206/2407404197_18ab7a3497.jpg" width="500" height="317" alt="IMG_8600" /></a>

I have to find at what the angle of the string is using the torque balance equation.

W= 167.4grams
a= 49cm
b= 98cm
m= 100grams
The angle is 51 degrees based on the measurements during the lab, but I have to figure out how to do it using the torque balance equation.

What my guess is for the equation is Wga = mgbsin(angle

Am I going in somewhat of the right direction? Also how would I get the angle by it's self. Or how do you move sin if I do at all?

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry, I didn't put the diagram in right.

2407404197_18ab7a3497.jpg
 
yes, you are correct, now just solve for the angle. You need to use the inverse sinus function.
 
When I punch it into my calculator I get error in the domain. It'd be sin^-1(Wa/mb correct?
 
yes, and it works fine for me and i get 56 degrees. try again.
 
if I calculate wa/mb then do sin_-1 it works out. Thanks

I have another question with this same diagram. "What are the predicted values of P_x and P_y?" Would it just be zero for both of them since there is no torque on it?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top