Calculating (1.4 x 106 m/s)2 - (3.5x104 m/s)2

  • Thread starter Thread starter bumblebeeliz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the expression (1.4 x 106 m/s)2 - (3.5 x 104 m/s)2, focusing on the proper handling of exponents and the subtraction of squared terms.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the process of squaring the terms and then subtracting them, with some questioning the accuracy of their calculations and the handling of exponents.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exchange about the correct method for rewriting numbers with different exponents to facilitate subtraction. Some participants have offered insights into manipulating exponents and the implications of dividing versus subtracting. The discussion remains open with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the application of exponent rules and the overall problem context, indicating a need for clarification on the mathematical principles involved.

bumblebeeliz
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(1.4 x 106 m/s)2 - (3.5x104 m/s)2

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



We square them and then do we subtract them? Which would equal to:

(1.4 x 106 m/s)2 - (3.5x104 m/s)2
(1.96 x 1012 m2/s2) - (1.22x108 m2/s2)
(1.95878 x 104 m2/s2 )

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bumblebeeliz said:
We square them and then do we subtract them? Which would equal to:

(1.4 x 106 m/s)2 - (3.5x104 m/s)2
(1.96 x 1012 m2/s2) - (1.22x108 m2/s2)
OK, except for a decimal mistake in one of your numbers.
(1.95878 x 104 m2/s2 )
No. How did you get this? (What's 1012 - 108? To subtract, rewrite the numbers so they have the same exponent.)
 
I thought we could subtract the exponent. I am not sure how to re-write the numbers and make them have the same exponent.
 
bumblebeeliz said:
I thought we could subtract the exponent.
Not when you are subtracting the numbers. Look what happens if you do:
102 - 101 ≠ 101
(100 - 10 = 90, not 10!)

I am not sure how to re-write the numbers and make them have the same exponent.
102 - 101 = 10x101 - 1x101 = (10-1)x101 = 90

1000 = 1x103 = 10x102 = 100x101
 
I see what you mean, but I am really not sure how to apply it in my situation. I basically factor it?

I also saw this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=100697

But for some reason it is really not clicking how I am supposed to apply it.

I looked at some resources online and somebody suggested to divide them to allow the subtraction:

1.4 x 1012 / 3.5 x 108 = 0.4 x 104
 
Last edited:
bumblebeeliz said:
I see what you mean, but I am really not sure how to apply it in my situation. I basically factor it?
Not sure what you mean by "factoring". Here's the trick. If you reduce the exponent by 1, then you must increase the number by a factor of 10 (since this is base 10). Which just means move the decimal point to the right by 1.

1.96 x 1012 = 19.6 x 1011 = 196 x 1010 = 1960 x 109

And so on...

I looked at some resources online and somebody suggested to divide them to allow the subtraction:

1.4 x 1012 / 3.5 x 108 = 0.4 x 104
When you divide two numbers, then you can just subtract the exponents. But you're subtracting two numbers.

Note: I'm taking your first expression, where you subtract the two numbers, as given. So this is really a math question, not a physics question, since you haven't described the problem you're trying to solve. If you're not sure whether you should be subtracting or dividing, then describe the complete problem you're trying to solve.
 
Ah! Its all about the tricks for beginners. Much better :)

= 19600 x 108 - 1.22x108
= 19598.7 x 108

or

= 1.959878 x 1012
 
One more question:

1.95978 x 1012/ 0.02

97.989 x 1012 /2

48.969 x 1011

4.9 x 1012

Is this correct? So when you divide, the exponent drops?
 
bumblebeeliz said:
One more question:

1.95978 x 1012/ 0.02

97.989 x 1012 /2
Careful. That "/2" shouldn't be there.

1.95978 x 1012/ 0.02 = (1.95978/ 0.02) x 1012 = 97.989 x 1012

Note that the denominator didn't have an exponent:
0.02 = 0.02 x 100
 
  • #10
Sorry, I meant this below: (scratch the first line)

97.989 x 1012 /2

48.969 x 1011

4.9 x 1012

(next time ill post the whole problem..sorry)
 
  • #11
bumblebeeliz said:
Sorry, I meant this below: (scratch the first line)

97.989 x 1012 /2

48.969 x 1011
No. The exponent doesn't change; just divide the numbers:
97.989 x 1012 /2 = (97.989/2) x 1012 = 48.969 x 1012
 
  • #12
Thanks for your patience :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K