Calculating Centripetal Force on a Child Riding a Ferris Wheel

AI Thread Summary
A 40kg child on a Ferris wheel with a radius of 9m and a rotation speed of 4 times per minute experiences specific forces at different points. The angular velocity is calculated at 0.419 radians per second, with a tangential velocity of 3.77 m/sec and centripetal acceleration of 1.58 m/sec². At the lowest point, the normal force exerted by the seat combines gravitational and centripetal forces, while at the highest point, it subtracts the centripetal force from gravity. The equations for calculating the normal force at both points are N = mg + mv²/r for the bottom and N = mg - mv²/r for the top. The calculations confirm the correct application of centripetal force principles in this scenario.
leisiminger
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
A 40kg child takes a ride on a Ferris Wheel that rotates 4 times each minute and has a radius of 9m.

I firgured that angular velocity is .419 rads/sec
I figured that tangential velocity is 3.77m/sec
I figured that centripetal acceleration is 1.58m/sec^2

Questions
a)What force in N does the seat exert on the child at the lowest point of the Ferris wheel?

b)What force in N does the seat exert on the child at the highest point of the Ferrish Wheel? Keep in mind that radially inward in the positive direction
 
Physics news on Phys.org
leisiminger said:
A 40kg child takes a ride on a Ferris Wheel that rotates 4 times each minute and has a radius of 9m.

I firgured that angular velocity is .419 rads/sec
I figured that tangential velocity is 3.77m/sec
I figured that centripetal acceleration is 1.58m/sec^2

Questions
a)What force in N does the seat exert on the child at the lowest point of the Ferris wheel?

b)What force in N does the seat exert on the child at the highest point of the Ferrish Wheel? Keep in mind that radially inward in the positive direction

Draw a force diagram at the bottom and the top.

F = m*a - so whatever acceleration the mass is experiencing should translate to the seat shouldn't it?
 
i figure for the bottom its
N= mg +mv^2
-------------
r

and the top would be

N= mg - mv^2
----------------
r
 
leisiminger said:
i figure for the bottom its
N= mg +mv^2
-------------
r

and the top would be

N= mg - mv^2
----------------
r

I think that's right, but your post displays unclearly.

N = m*g + m*v2/r

So if that is your first one and similarly for the second ... yes.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top