Calculating Change in Internal Energy: A Steam Engine's Performance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the change in internal energy of a steam engine pulling eight cars, emphasizing the relationship between heat, work, and kinetic energy. The initial calculations incorrectly assumed constant acceleration, leading to an inaccurate force and work calculation. It was noted that the total mass of the system should be 9 kg, but this still did not yield the correct answer. The correct approach involves using the work/kinetic energy theorem to determine work done, which aligns with the observed distance and acceleration. Ultimately, recognizing the inconsistency in acceleration is crucial for accurate calculations.
jmb07
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
A steam engine of 1kg pulls 8 cars of 1kg each. The velocity of the engine is 0m/s initially then gets up to 4m/s in a time of 4 s while moving a distance of 5.3 meters. During that time, the engine takes in 134J of heat. What is the change in internal energy?


Ok so i know that:
internal energy= Q + W
and, W=Fd
and, F=ma

so, (8x1kg)(4m/s/4s) = 8 N = F
also, W= (8N)(5.3m) = 42.4
so, internal energy = 134 J + (-42.4) = 91.6

However, the correct answer is about 62, what am i doing wrong?? It seems like the steps would make sense to get the correct answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The total mass of the system is more than 8 kg.
 
oops! so it would be 9 kg?? Even then, the answer would still be incorrect...
 
i realized i have to use the work/kinetic energy theorem...i got it! thanks!
 
If I use the change in kinetic energy of the train to calculate the work done, I get the right answer. Doing so bypasses using the average acceleration to calculate the force.

The hint that you should not do the latter thing comes from the fact that the distance covered during the 4 s is NOT consistent with constant acceleration at 1 m/s^2 suggesting that a is not constant and that calculating force using a_average won't be good enough.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top