Calculating Electric Field and Potential of a Charged Hollow Ball

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field and potential of a charged hollow ball with uniform volume charge density. Participants emphasize using Gauss's Law to determine the electric field at specified distances from the center, noting the importance of integrating the charge distribution. For electric potential, the relationship between electric field and potential is highlighted, particularly for spherically symmetric cases. The method for finding the speed of a charge upon hitting the ball involves equating electric potential energy to kinetic energy. The original poster expresses gratitude and acknowledges a potential integration error, indicating a willingness to seek further clarification if needed.
cherrios
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I've been having some trouble with this problem: A hollow ball that has radius=X, has uniform volume charge density of \rho.

1) Gauss's Law->Find electric field at .1X and 3X from the center

2)What is electric potential at .1X and 3X from center?

3) Find electric potential energy of charge q, with mass = m, when it is released 3X from center of the hollow ball. When it hits the ball, what is its speed?

For 3, would I have to equate electric potential energy to kinetic energy, and then solve for velocity?

Any tips would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does the ball have a uniform volume charge density if it's hollow? I find that confusing, I think it's meant to be a solid sphere of charge.

Your method for #3 should work fine, did you do the other two okay?
 
oh sorry, it's filled with uniform volume charge
 
cherrios said:
I've been having some trouble with this problem: A hollow ball that has radius=X, has uniform volume charge density of \rho.

1) Gauss's Law->Find electric field at .1X and 3X from the center

2)What is electric potential at .1X and 3X from center?

3) Find electric potential energy of charge q, with mass = m, when it is released 3X from center of the hollow ball. When it hits the ball, what is its speed?

For 3, would I have to equate electric potential energy to kinetic energy, and then solve for velocity?

Any tips would be much appreciated!

1) Generally, when you need to find an electric field use Gauss' Law. The trick here is in the answer to the question, how much charge is inside your Gaussian surface? In this case, the charge distribution in uniform, so just integrate over the volume of the surface: q_{in} = \int_0^r \rho r^2 sin \theta dr d \theta d\phi = \rho * (4/3) \pi r^3, where r is the radius of your (hopefully spherical!) Gaussian surface. Now apply Gauss' Law. For the outside calculation remember that the object's radius ends at r = X. So we have a total charge Q = \rho * (4/3) \pi X^3.

2) Recall the relationship between the Electric Field and the Electric Potential. Now, since E is spherically symmetric, the E and V are related by a simple derivative of r.

3) Your method sounds like a plan to me. Unless you really WANT to find the force on the ball, use F = ma, then use the uniform linear acceleration equations. I'd rather use your method. :biggrin:

-Dan
 
Thank guys! I think I should be fine for now; I believe I had an integration error. I might have some questions later... but thanks again!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top