Calculating Electric Field on Skin Surface with Decibels - Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter tamtam402
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decibels
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field E1 at a depth of 1 cm into the skin, given the surface electric field E0 and a loss in decibels. The confusion arises between using 10log and 20log in the equations for decibels. The user initially applies 10log, leading to a calculated value of k, but the teacher uses 20log, resulting in a different k value. The user questions whether 20log should be used, arguing that it should already account for the power density loss without needing to square the ratio. Ultimately, clarity on the appropriate logarithmic approach is sought to resolve the discrepancy in calculations.
tamtam402
Messages
199
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let E1 be the electric field 1cm into a person's skin and E0 be the electric field on the surface of that person's skin. If the field loses -486db/m and E0 = 64.1, find the value of E1.


Homework Equations



E1/E0 = k, with k < 1


The Attempt at a Solution



Well I'm mostly confused about the use of 20log vs 10log. My solution is:

We have -486dB/m, or -4.86dB/cm.

10log(E1) = 10log(k) + 10log(E0), where 10log(k) must be negative since k < 1.

We know that 10log(k) = -4.68, thus k = 10^(-4.68/10) = 0.3404

However, my teacher wrote the following equation:
20log(E1) = 20log(k) + 20log(E0)

Which gives a different value of k, obviously. I thought decibels were always 10log(ratio), and the only reason why 20log(ratio) sometimes appear is when you have a ratio of squared values, such as 10log(P1/P2) = 10log([V1^2/R]/[V2^2/r]) = 10log(V1^2/V2^2) = 20log(V1/V2) in electronics.

I'd like to know if 10log or 20log should be used in this situation. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One more thing. Would I be right to assume that using the 20log equations give the ratio k of power density loss that corresponds to the electric field loss? I ask this because the teacher uses his ratio k that he found with the 20log equations, then argues that since P1/P0 = E1^2/E0^2, the ratio of P1/P2 = k^2... I thought that using 20log would already give the "correct k" for the P1/P0 ratio without needing to square it.
 
You've basically said it yourself:
$$10\ \log\, \left( \frac{P_1}{P_2} \right) = 10\ \log\, \left( \frac{E_1^2}{E_2^2} \right) = 20\ \log\, \left( \frac{E_1}{E_2} \right). $$
You are using field strength in this problem, so ##\ldots##
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top