Calculating Electrical Force on Alpha Particle Near Gold Nucleus

AI Thread Summary
An alpha particle with a charge of +2e is approaching a gold nucleus with a charge of +79e, and the electrical force can be calculated using Coulomb's law. The user initially calculated the force as E = 2.6 x 10^40 N, which was incorrect, while the textbook answer is 91 N. The error was clarified as a misunderstanding of the charge unit, where e represents the fundamental charge of a proton (+1.6 x 10^-19 C). After correcting this, the user confirmed they understood the concept and arrived at the correct answer. This discussion highlights the importance of accurately applying fundamental constants in physics calculations.
komarxian
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An alpha particle (charge equals +2e) is sent at high speed toward a gold nucleus (charge equals +79e). What is the electrical force acting on the alpha particle when it is (2.0 x 10-14) m from the gold nucleus?

Homework Equations


I tried using Coulomb's law, which is E = k(q1q2/r2), with k = 9 x 109.

The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted to use Coulomb's law, and plugged it into get

E = (9 x 109)(2e)(79e)/(2 x 10-14)

and my answer was

E= 2.6 x 1040
E is a repelling force

The answer in my textbook is E=91 N and it is a repelling force (I got that part right at least!), and I would really like to know where I went wrong. I was thinking maybe by some chance I plugged it into my calculator wrong, but if someone could double check or tell me where I went wrong, that would be amazing.

Thank you so much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your equation e represents the fundamental unit of charge, not e the base of the natural logarithms. What's the charge on a proton?
 
  • Like
Likes komarxian
gneill said:
In your equation e represents the fundamental unit of charge, not e the base of the natural logarithms. What's the charge on a proton?
OH! Thank you so much. I got the right answer. A proton is q = +1.6 x 10-19 C. Now I know that for in the future.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top