Calculating Electron Speed Between Two Point Charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter weathercheck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Electron
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of an electron released between two point charges, +3.00 nC and +2.00 nC, separated by 50.0 cm. The user attempts to apply the formula v = sqrt(2Q(Va-Vb)/m) but is confused about the values for Va and Vb. Other participants suggest using conservation of energy principles instead, emphasizing the need to calculate the electric potentials at the initial and final positions of the electron. They highlight that the user should derive the electric potentials from the point charges to find the correct energy values. The conversation underscores the importance of understanding electric potential in solving problems involving charged particles.
weathercheck
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two stationary point charges + 3.00 {\rm nC} and + 2.00 {\rm nC} are separated by a distance of 50.0 \rm cm. An electron is released from rest at a point midway between the two charges and moves along the line connecting the two charges

Homework Equations


What is the speed of the electron when it is 10.0 \rm cm from the + 3.00- {\rm nC} charge?


The Attempt at a Solution



Dont know where i am going wrong and need to inpout this like now!

using

v = sqrt(2Q(Va-Vb)/m)

Got Va-Vb = 225

then surely i just chuck in the value for Q of an Electron and the Mass!

But no work!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
weathercheck said:
using
v = sqrt(2Q(Va-Vb)/m)

Got Va-Vb = 225

How the heck did you get that? You don't know what v is!

I don't know where you pulled that equation from, but it's definitely not the one you want to be using here. Treat this as a problem in conservation of energy. What is the energy of the electron when it is midway between the two charges? What is the energy once it has moved 50cm?
 
i said 0 + q0Va = 1/2mv^2 + q0Vb
 
That's true, but you're skipping over the important details. You have a formula for calculating the electric potentials of point charges, right?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top