Calculating Flux Linkage for Sphere at a Given Distance | Electric Flux Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the flux linkage for a sphere of radius R located at a distance x0 on the x-axis. The original poster questions the direction of the electric field and its relation to flux, assuming parallel field lines entering and leaving the sphere. It is clarified that with a charge Q enclosed in the sphere, the electric field lines are parallel to the x-axis. The conversation emphasizes that according to Gauss's law, the total flux through the sphere is directly related to the net charge contained within it. Understanding this relationship is crucial for calculating the flux linkage in this scenario.
Nipun
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can anybody help me find the:

The flux linkage with sphere of radius R placed at x=x0 (distance on the x axis).
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    2 KB · Views: 499
Physics news on Phys.org
It would have been better if you told the direction(s) of the Field , or isn't there any field here? , Flux is the electric field through unit area. I assume that the elEctric field lines entering the sphere are all parallel and in the same direction.Then the number of lines entering the sphere= No. of lines leaving the sphere , and hence the there is no net flux.

BJ

BJ
 
I am unfamiliar with the term "flux linkage" in this context. Can you restate your question?
 
I am so sorry. I forgot that a charge Q is enclosed in the sphere and the electric field lines are parallel to x-axis from left to right.and flux linkage means simply flux.
 
Gauss's law relates the total flux through a closed surface (like this sphere) to the net charged contained within it. That's all you need.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top