Calculating Kinetic Energy of Rotating Sphere: 3.2kg, 63cm, 230rev/min

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the kinetic energy of a rotating solid sphere with a mass of 3.2 kg and a diameter of 63 cm, rotating at 230 revolutions per minute. The correct conversion of the diameter to meters is crucial, as it should be 0.63 meters, which is then halved to find the radius. The inertia of the sphere is calculated using the formula I = 2/5MR^2, leading to an initial kinetic energy calculation of 147.5 J. The error identified was the failure to convert the diameter to radius properly before applying it in the formulas. The participant acknowledges the mistake and thanks others for their assistance.
Hollywood
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A uniform, solid sphere of mass 3.2 kg and diameter 63 cm is rotating about its diameter at 230 rev/min. What is the kinetic energy of rotation?

230rev/min= 24.1 rad/s

I know that KE=1/2Iw^2 and interia of a solid sphere is I=2/5MR^2

I=(2/5)(3.2)(.63)^2
=.508032

KE=(1/2)(.508032)(24.1)^2
=147.5 J

For some reason my answer is wrong. Am I missing something? What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hollywood said:
A uniform, solid sphere of mass 3.2 kg and diameter 63 cm is rotating about its diameter at 230 rev/min. What is the kinetic energy of rotation?

230rev/min= 24.1 rad/s

I know that KE=1/2Iw^2 and interia of a solid sphere is I=2/5MR^2

I=(2/5)(3.2)(.63)^2
=.508032

KE=(1/2)(.508032)(24.1)^2
=147.5 J

For some reason my answer is wrong. Am I missing something? What am I doing wrong?
Yup, just a little mistake.

PS Welcome to the PF!
 
63 cm

But doesn't 63cm need to be converted to meters making it .63 meters?
 
It needs to be converted to a radius too!
 
Thanks

I see now! LOL! My bad. Very dumb mistake! Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top