Calculating Length Change of Heated Copper Rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dantheman1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Copper Expansion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the length change of a copper rod when heated from 22.0°C to 100.0°C. The formula for linear expansion is applied, using the coefficient of linear expansion for copper, which is 16.8 x 10^-6. The calculated change in length is 0.052 cm, confirming the initial attempt at a solution. Participants agree that the values and formula used are correct, emphasizing that thermal expansion is generally a small effect. The conversation reassures that the calculations align with expected results.
Dantheman1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A copper rod is 40.0cm long at 22.0 Celsius. If the rod is heated to 100.0 Celsius, what is it's increase in length.

Homework Equations


Linear expansion of copper is 16.8*10^-6

The Attempt at a Solution


Change in Length= (length)(change in temp.)(α)
So...
(40.0)(78.0)(16.8*10^-6)
=0.052 cm is the change in length?

Please let me know if/what I did wrong here.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What answer are you expecting?
 
Hypersphere said:
What answer are you expecting?

Don't know, I acctually may have not got it wrong i just wanted to make sure.
 
Dantheman1 said:
Don't know, I acctually may have not got it wrong i just wanted to make sure.

OK. Well, if it makes you feel better, those values (assuming you give α in the usual units) and the linear expansion formula does give me the same answer. Basically, thermal expansion is a small effect, which thus mainly matters for larger things.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top