Calculating masses of 2 objects pushing off of one another

  • Thread starter Thread starter Patra
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves two ice dancers, Boris and Natasha, with a combined mass of 136 kg, who push off from each other, moving at different speeds. The momentum conservation equation is applied, where the total momentum before and after they push apart must remain equal. By setting up equations for their masses and using elimination, the individual masses are calculated to be approximately 77.71 kg for Natasha and 58.29 kg for Boris. The solution checks out as their momenta are nearly equal, confirming the calculations. This demonstrates the application of momentum conservation in an inelastic collision scenario.
Patra
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two ice dancers, Boris and Natasha, have a combined mass of 136kg. They embrace and push apart from each other: Boris moving at 0.90m/s and Natasha moving at 1.2m/s in the opposite direction. Find their individual masses.

Homework Equations


p=mv


The Attempt at a Solution


It seems so stunningly simple, yet I am at a loss as to how to attempt it without having a time variable or knowing the mass of one of the skaters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use the equation (m1+m2)vf=mv1+mv2, this is an inelastic collision problem. Maybe that will help a little more than p=mv
 
Thanks, so does that mean it should be something along the lines of (m1+m2)vf=(136kg)(0.90m/s)+(136kg)(1.2m/s)? Should I be using substitution at some point during this problem?
 
no, both ice dancers start together, then push a part from each other
(m1 + m2)v just equals the momentum of the two dancers as a whole because they both initially start out together.
so the only two unknown variables are m1 and m2
 
(136 kg) * 0 m/s = m1 (1.2 m/s) + m2 ( -.9 m/s)

0 = 1.2m + -.9 m Keep in mind they are separate variables

You also have m1 + m2 = 136.

So put those equations on top of each other and i like to use elimination. Here is the work:

1.2m -.9 m = 0
-1.2(m1 + m2 = 136)
Which gives you
1.2 m -.9 m =0
-1.2 m -1.2 m = -163.2
Which simplifies to
-2.1 m = -163.2 (we are solving for m2, i always made m2 second in every equation)
m2 = 77.71 kg
m1= 136- 77.71= 58.29 kg

You can check it and you get there respective momentums which should be equal to be 69.948= -69.939, so its close enough

* And yeah my method is a little different from the other persons. I did this chapter a while ago so i kind of forgot that stuff..lol
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top