Calculating masses of 2 objects pushing off of one another

  • Thread starter Thread starter Patra
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves two ice dancers, Boris and Natasha, with a combined mass of 136 kg, who push off from each other, moving at different speeds. The momentum conservation equation is applied, where the total momentum before and after they push apart must remain equal. By setting up equations for their masses and using elimination, the individual masses are calculated to be approximately 77.71 kg for Natasha and 58.29 kg for Boris. The solution checks out as their momenta are nearly equal, confirming the calculations. This demonstrates the application of momentum conservation in an inelastic collision scenario.
Patra
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two ice dancers, Boris and Natasha, have a combined mass of 136kg. They embrace and push apart from each other: Boris moving at 0.90m/s and Natasha moving at 1.2m/s in the opposite direction. Find their individual masses.

Homework Equations


p=mv


The Attempt at a Solution


It seems so stunningly simple, yet I am at a loss as to how to attempt it without having a time variable or knowing the mass of one of the skaters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use the equation (m1+m2)vf=mv1+mv2, this is an inelastic collision problem. Maybe that will help a little more than p=mv
 
Thanks, so does that mean it should be something along the lines of (m1+m2)vf=(136kg)(0.90m/s)+(136kg)(1.2m/s)? Should I be using substitution at some point during this problem?
 
no, both ice dancers start together, then push a part from each other
(m1 + m2)v just equals the momentum of the two dancers as a whole because they both initially start out together.
so the only two unknown variables are m1 and m2
 
(136 kg) * 0 m/s = m1 (1.2 m/s) + m2 ( -.9 m/s)

0 = 1.2m + -.9 m Keep in mind they are separate variables

You also have m1 + m2 = 136.

So put those equations on top of each other and i like to use elimination. Here is the work:

1.2m -.9 m = 0
-1.2(m1 + m2 = 136)
Which gives you
1.2 m -.9 m =0
-1.2 m -1.2 m = -163.2
Which simplifies to
-2.1 m = -163.2 (we are solving for m2, i always made m2 second in every equation)
m2 = 77.71 kg
m1= 136- 77.71= 58.29 kg

You can check it and you get there respective momentums which should be equal to be 69.948= -69.939, so its close enough

* And yeah my method is a little different from the other persons. I did this chapter a while ago so i kind of forgot that stuff..lol
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top