Calculating Maximum Speed of 2kg Block on a Spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter JOJOKOY
  • Start date Start date
JOJOKOY
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A 2 kg block is attached to the bottom of a spring that has spring constant of 50 N/m and block is at first at equilibrium point where it will hang motionless if undisturbed. Where will it be when it reaches its maximum speed of 4.0 meters per second?

I thought it would be the equilibrium point because that is when it has the greatest force of gravity acting on it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The force of gravity is constant through out. Start with the position equation for simple harmonic motion.
 
The gravitational field is calculated from g = -GM/r^2 where the negative sign indicates that the field is toward mass M, which in this case would be the mass of the Earth. G is the gravitational constant and r is the distance from the center of the object of mass M and the point you are interested in. Therefore the value of g increases as you move closer to the center of the Earth, so the gravitational force is at it's maximum when the block is at it's lowest point.

You are however correct in saying the maximum speed occurs at the equilibrium point, and you can argue that this is true from energy considerations without doing any calculations.

Edit: Forgot to mention, the distances that the block would move would be so small compared to the radius of the Earth that the force due to gravity may be treated as a constant.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top