Calculating mechanical eff. @ ICE

In summary, the speaker has been trying to model the mechanical efficiency of an internal combustion engine (ICE) using two methods. The first method, which involved calculating \etam = \frac{bp}{bp+fp}, did not work well due to incorrect assumptions about friction power (fp). The speaker then decided to calculate the required brake power (bp_required) by back calculating the power from the tires and using that to determine the %load on the engine. However, the load values were found to be too high, indicating a problem with bp_required. The speaker suggests estimating the fuel flow to the engine to calculate the total chemical power available in the gasoline and use that to determine the ratio between theoretical maximum power output and measured engine output.
  • #1
Mr. Red
1
0
Hi guys,

I have been trying to model mechanical eff. of an ICE. I have two methods for that one using:

[tex]\eta[/tex]m = [tex]\frac{bp}{bp+fp}[/tex]

where bp = brake power
fp = friction power

This method did not work well because of bad assumptions in fp. So I decided to calculate the bp_required from back calculating the power from the tires. And using that to calculate the %load on the engine however the load values are too high so there should be a problem with bp_required. I calculate bp_required through coast-down test. What can be the reason of high bp_required? Do you have any idea or suggestion to check?

Thanks,
- Red
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you know the fuel flow to the engine at a specific horsepower rating you can calculate the total chemical power available in the gasoline (volume/time times energy/volume = energy/time = power) and use that number to determine the ratio between the theroetical maximum power output and the measured engine output.

If the fuel flow isn't directly measured, you could make an estimate based on the volumetric flow efficiency of the engine, the manifold pressure (could be estimated to be atmospheric pressure on a naturally aspirated engine at full throttle), and the Air/Fuel ratio in the cylinder. It's important to note that most engines at full throttle push an air/fuel ratio of 12.0:1 rather than 14.7:1, to develop maximum power.
 

1. What is mechanical efficiency in an internal combustion engine?

Mechanical efficiency in an internal combustion engine refers to the ratio of the engine's output power to its input power. It measures how effectively the engine converts the chemical energy of fuel into mechanical energy.

2. How do you calculate mechanical efficiency?

Mechanical efficiency can be calculated by dividing the engine's output power by its input power and multiplying the result by 100 to get a percentage. The input power is typically the fuel's energy content, while the output power is the power delivered to the wheels or propeller.

3. What factors can affect the mechanical efficiency of an internal combustion engine?

There are several factors that can affect the mechanical efficiency of an internal combustion engine. These include friction between moving parts, incomplete combustion of fuel, and heat loss through the engine's exhaust and cooling systems.

4. How can mechanical efficiency be improved in an internal combustion engine?

To improve the mechanical efficiency of an internal combustion engine, engineers can modify the engine's design to reduce friction between moving parts, improve the fuel combustion process, and optimize the exhaust and cooling systems to minimize heat loss.

5. Why is mechanical efficiency important in internal combustion engines?

Mechanical efficiency is important in internal combustion engines because it directly affects the engine's performance and fuel efficiency. A higher mechanical efficiency means the engine can produce more power with less fuel, resulting in better overall performance and lower fuel consumption.

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
878
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
661
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
740
Replies
11
Views
997
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top