Calculating Min Incident Angle for Ray Emerging from Prism

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum incident angle for a ray to emerge from a prism with an apex angle of 74.3° and a refractive index of 1.55. The user initially solved for the angle of deviation (delta) and found it to be 65.4 degrees, leading to an incident angle of 28.3 degrees. However, there is confusion regarding the necessity of calculating delta and the origin of the "/2" in the equations. Participants express uncertainty about the correct approach to finding the incident angle without determining the critical angle. The conversation highlights the complexity of applying the relevant equations to solve the problem effectively.
NikkiNik
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the apex angle of a prism is f = 74.3° (see figure below),

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d2/NikkiNik88/apex.gif

what is the minimum incident angle for a ray if it is to emerge from the opposite side (i.e., not be totally internally reflected), given n = 1.55?



Homework Equations



sin(alpha + delta)/2 =nsin(alpha/2)

delta = incindence angle + alpha/2

The Attempt at a Solution



delta = min angle of deviation
alpha = apex angle

I solved for delta and got 65.4 deg

Then I used the second equation to solve for the incident angle and got 28.3 deg

I'm not even sure if I should go so far as to solve for delta. I'm thinking there is a simpler way
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi NikkiNik! :smile:

(have an alpha: α and a delta: δ and a phi: φ :wink:)
NikkiNik said:
sin(alpha + delta)/2 =nsin(alpha/2)

delta = incindence angle + alpha/2

Sorry, I've no idea what you're doing. :redface:

Where does "/2" come from?

And what are your first incident angle, refracted angle, and second incident angle? :confused:
 
I found in the equations in my book

(1) (sin(α + δ))/2 = n*sin(α/2)

All I'm given is the apex angle and n and I'm not sure where to go from there. Since I'm not supposed to find the critical angle I'm not sure how to go about finding the incident angle.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top