Calculating Period of Torsion Pendulum

  • Thread starter Thread starter rdn98
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum Torsion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the oscillation period of a torsion pendulum after modifying the length of a meter stick. The original period is 5 seconds for a 1-meter length, and the new length is 0.76 meters. The moment of inertia is given by 1/12 ML^2, and while the mass M cancels out in calculations, the torsion constant k must be determined from the initial conditions. The derived period for the shorter length should be 3.8 seconds, which is consistent with the linear relationship between length and period. However, there are discrepancies in calculations, with some participants suggesting that the expected answer differs from their results, prompting requests for further clarification.
rdn98
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
A uniform meter stick is hung at its center from a thin wire. It is twisted and oscillates with a period of 5 s. The meter stick is then sawed off to a length of 0.76 m, rebalanced at its center, and set into oscillation.
******************

With what period does it now oscillate?

Ok, I know that the period for a torsion pendulum T=2pi*sqrt(I/k)

Where I is moment of inertia
and K is the torsion constant

Two things I am stuck on.
To calculate the moment of inertia => 1/12 ML^2
I need to konw the mass of the rod...unless this mass drops out of the calculations, I don't know what to do

Also, the torsion constant. I do not konw what that is either, unless that too also drops out of my calculations. A little guiadance here greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • stick.gif
    stick.gif
    1.2 KB · Views: 1,029
Physics news on Phys.org
The mass does drop out of the calculations. Use the data point you are given to find k.

You know that

T = 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{(1/12) ML^2}{k}}

is valid when T = 5 and L = 1. You can solve this expression for k. Leave k in terms of M.

Now use the equation to solve for the situation when L = 0.76. M cancels. I get 3.8 seconds.

Check this answer for sanity: 3.8 / 5 is the same ratio as 0.76 / 1. In other words, the period shrinks linearly with a decreasing length of rod. Does this make sense?

1) The period decreases at the rod is made smaller. This is as expected.

2) The period is linear with respect to the length. An inspection of the formula reveals that L is first squared, then its square root is taken. Yes, the period should be linear in L.

The answer makes sense.

- Warren
 
sorry but, I have the same problem with the same numbers and 3.8 seconds is not the answer according to the computer program that grades the problem.

Also when I solve for K as you stated, K= (T/2pi)^2*(1/12)ML^2
When you insert that back into the original equation T=2pi*sqrt((1/12)ML^2/k)
then the (1/12)ML^2 cancels...which leaves the new period, T, equal to 2pi*sqrt(1/(t^2/4pi^2))
This yields an answer of 7.895, which is also wrong. I don't see what is wrong here, but 3.8 seconds was also not correct. Any additional advice? Thanks!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top